Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to decide when the clock starts on a criminal defendant’s term of supervised release. Ordinarily, the answer is straightforward — supervised release begins once the defendant leaves prison and reenters society. Darrin Mar-anda’s case, however, presents an unusual situation: a defendant who has completed his prison sentence, but who r

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: *534 Maranda ODonnell and other plaintiffs (collectively, "ODonnell") brought a class action suit against Harris County, Texas, and a number of its officials-including County Judges, 1 Hearing O

Matter of Maranda WW. v Michael XX. (2023 NY Slip Op 04622) Matter of Maranda WW. v Michael XX. 2023 NY Slip Op 04622 Decided on September 14, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua

Case: 18-20466 Document: 00514794513 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/14/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-20466 January 14, 2019

Case: 18-20466 Document: 00514599856 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-20466 FILED August 14, 2018

PER CURIAM: Defendant-Appellee Michael Metter moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27 and Local Rule 27.1 to dismiss the government’s interlocutory appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Dora L. Irizarry, Judge) suppressing certain evidence in connection with a criminal trial in which Me

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: The appellees' petition for panel rehearing is granted. The prior panel opinion, ODonnell v. Harris County , 882 F.3d 528 (5th Cir. 2018) is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted:

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DORA L. IRIZARRY, District Judge: The instant action arises out of a multidefendant indictment alleging that defendants participated in a fraudulent scheme to publicly report false and materially overstated sales figures to create artificial demand for, and increase the share price and trading volume of, the common stock of Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (“Spongeteeh”).

524 F.3d 1073 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel CHAPMAN; Sean Flanagan; Herbert Jacobi, Defendants-Appellees. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Chapman; Sean Flanagan; Herbert Jacobi, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 06-10316, 06-10610. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 13, 2007.

502 F.3d 122 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Gregg BECKER, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 06-1274-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: June 13, 2007. Decided: September 13, 2007. *123 *124 Joshua Klein, Assistant United States Attorney (Ro

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, hel

208 B.R. 467 (1994) In re Edward Charles MARANDA, Jr., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 4-92-833. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota. May 5, 1994. *468 J. Thomas Church, Minneapolis, MN, for Objecting Party. Michael J. Iannacone, St. Paul, MN, for Defendant. ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION RO

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,

*430 SUMMARY ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART. Norman Bernstein appeals from his conviction and from the sentence imposed by Judge Casey following his plea of guilty to charges of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

YETKA, Justice. This action arose on September 23, 1985, when Mary Maranda moved the court for an order, pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 60.-02(3), (6), to reopen a judgment and decree that vacated the property settlement provisions of a decree of dissolution dated August 23, 1979, which had dissolved the marriage of Mary and Edward Maranda and had incorporated a written stipulation of the parties dividing their assets. Mary claim

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court, entered on November 9, 2000, be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED. Defendant-Appellant Richard Alberto Hernandez, an alien from the Dominican Republic, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen G. Schwartz, Judge) sentencing him to fifty-seven

PER CURIAM: Defendants-appellants Mohammad A. Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Ahmad Mohammad Ajaj, and Mahmoud Abouhalima were convicted and sentenced in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Duffy, Judge) following a jury trial on numerous charges arising out of their involvement in the February 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City. In a previous appeal, we affirmed the convictions, but,

KEARSE, Circuit Judge. Defendant Jerome E. Rosen appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York following his plea of *538 guilty before Shirley Wohl Kram, Judge, convicting him of securities fraud, in violation of 15 U.S

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge: Frank Senerchia (“Senerchia”), a retired detective with the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, /.). The district court granted a motion to dismiss Senerchia’s attempt to have the federal courts review and reverse a determination that Senerc-hia was not entitled to benefits un