Cases

ORDER MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court on plaintiffs Application for Attorneys’ Fees after trial and entry of judgment in plaintiffs favor. Plaintiff argues that the position of the United States Department of Agriculture, by the Natural Resources Conservation Service Agency (the “NRCS” or the “agency”), both before and during litigation was not “substantially justified” within the

118 F.Supp. 511 (1954) UNITED STATES v. MANNO et al. UNITED STATES v. PARDY et al. Nos. 53 CR 421-422. United States District Court N. D. Illinois. January 13, 1954. *512 Crawford & Healy, Chicago, Ill., for defendants Nick Manno, Sam Manno and Fred Manno. George F. Callaghan, Chicago, Ill., for defendants

OPINION OF THE COURT ROSENN, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents an issue of first impression in this circuit pertaining to a lawyer’s right to make extrajudicial statements to the press relating to a former client’s pending criminal case. The exchange between the defendant’s former lawyer and a member of the press resulted in a newspaper article that ra

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT WALNER DESHOMMES, Appellant, v. MANNO EXALANT, Appellee. No. 4D22-513 [November 2, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John B.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Laird v. Potter, 367 So.2d 642 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Threshermen & Farmer’s Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. Koltunovsky, 166 So.2d 462 (Fla.3d DCA 1964), cert. den. 184 So.2d 450 (Fla.1965); Kilbride v. Carbon Dioxide & Magnesia Co., 201 Pa. 552, 51 A. 347 (1902).

OPINION AND ORDER CHARLES R. NORGLE, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Yihao Ben Pu’s (“Pu”) motion to dismiss the *849Superseding Indictment. Also before the Court are Sahil Uppal’s (“Uppal”) motions to dismiss Counts Four through Nine and Count Twenty-Three of the Superseding Indictment, or alternatively for a bill of particulars. For

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.

657 F.Supp.2d 425 (2009) Karen MANNO, Plaintiff, v. TENNESSEE PRODUCTION CENTER, INC., Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 10360(BSJ). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 11, 2009. *427 Sandor Frankel, Stuart Edward Abrams, William Joseph Brady, III, Frankel & Abrams, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Joseph Martin Ca

439 F.Supp.2d 418 (2006) Charles MANNO and Susan E. Manno, h/w, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CO., Defendant. No. 05-CV-1222. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 12, 2006. *419 *420 *421 Jack M. Bernard, Philadelphia, PA, for Pla

AMENDED MEMORANDUM . AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: Pending before the Court are five motions filed by Defendant Kmart Corporation (“Kmart”): a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based on Payers Definitions of Usual and Customary Price (Doc. 204); a Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Dale A. Chamberlain (Doc. 212); a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based on Claims in Other Than

162 F.Supp.2d 750 (2001) William M. KING, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 5:00-CV-2667. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 18, 2001. *751 Elizabeth A. Raies, Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos & Recupero, Gary A. Corroto, Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos & Recupero, Canton, OH, for William

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 15-365 L; 18-1591 L Filed: January 17, 2025 ________________________________________ ) KENT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

96 Md. App. 22 (1993) 623 A.2d 677 RONALD ANTHONY MANNO v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1038, September Term, 1992. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 28, 1993. Sherrie B. Glasser, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Cathleen C. Brockmeyer, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph C

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-2181 L Filed: October 31, 2024 ________________________________________ ) DEBORAH E. BARRON and JOHN ) BUENAVENTURA BAEZ, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, )

9 F.Supp.2d 320 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, v. John A. GOTTI, et al., Defendants. No. 98 Cr. 42(BDP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 15, 1998. *321 Carol Sipperly, Marjorie Miller, Asst. U.S. Attys., Vincent Heintz, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., White Plains, NY, for U.S.A.

996 F.Supp. 321 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, v. John A. GOTTI, Louis Ricco, Mario Antonicelli, Gregory Depalma, Craig Depalma, Michael Sergio, Stephen Sergio, William Marshall, Dominick Loiacono, Robert Sanseverino, Leonard Minuto, Sr., Steven Fortunato, Vincent Zollo, Peter Forchetti, Christian Binnie, John Forcelli, Marco Barros, Anthony Plomitallo, Michael Zamburos, Salvatore Locascio, Angelo Prisco, John Sialiano and Dennis McLain, Defend

MEMORANDUM OPINION TIMOTHY R. RICE, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff United States of America seeks to admit evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) of a subsequent bad act committed by one of the claimants. Plaintiff contends the evidence is relevant to establish the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture as drug proceeds because the subsequent bad act helps prove th