Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Magdaleno-Martinez”
United States v. Rodriguezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Strike the *1223Expert Testimony of Bryan Acee, filed June 25, 2015 (Doc. 81)(“MIL”). The Court held a hearing on July 2, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the anticipated testimony of Plaintiff Unit
United States v. Chapmanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before Court on the Motion for Daubert Hearing and to Exclude Testimony Offered to Bolster Testimony from Another Witness, filed September 10, 2014 (Doc. 32)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on September 12, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the testimony of Gail Starr, Plaintiff United Stat
United States v. Harrypublic domain
UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. You can’t hide your lyin’ eyes And your smile is a thin disguise I thought by now you’d realize There ain’t no way to hide your lyin’ eyes The Eagles, Lyin’ Eyes (1975 Cass County Music & Red Cloud Music).<
United States v. Goxcon-Chagalpublic domain
*1125 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Unqualified Expert Testimony II, filed July 16, 2012 (Doc. 73) (“Motion in Limine”). The Court held hearings on July 25 and July 30, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether United Stat
United States v. Goxcon-Chagalpublic domain
*1226 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion in Limine to Exclude Unqualified Expert Testimony, filed April 23, 2012 (Doc. 55) (“Motion in Limine”). The Court held a hearing on July 25, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether Ivar Helia, an agent with the Drug E
United States v. Gilbert Espinoza-Seanez, Ernesto Espinoza-Seanez and Raul Lazarin-Becerrapublic domain
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: The appellants, Gilbert Espinoza-Seanez, Ernesto Espinoza-Seanez and Raul Laza-rin-Becerra (hereafter Gilbert, Ernesto, and Lazarin, respectively) were found guilty of conspiracy to possess marihuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846(1). Gilbert was also found guilty of the substantive offense of possession. Gilbert received concurrent sentences of five
De Pacheco v. Martinezpublic domain
515 F.Supp.2d 773 (2007) Ana [Lorena] Alonzo [Alcaraz] DE PACHECO, and Jose Angel Pacheco, Plaintiffs, v. Martha N. MARTINEZ, d/b/a Martinez Bookkeeping Services; Alicia Castro, d/b/a Christian Scribing Services, d/b/a Alicia Castro Income Tax Service; Erasmo Castro, Sr. & Jr.; Melissa [Castro] Infante; Magdaleno Infante; United States Department of Homeland Security; Alfonso R. DeLeon, District Director for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigrati
Nielsen v. Preappublic domain
Justice KAVANAUGH, concurring. I write separately to emphasize the narrowness of the issue before us and, in particular, to emphasize what this case is not about. This case is not about whether a noncitizen may be removed from the United States on the basis of criminal offenses. Under longstanding federal statutes, the Executive Branch may remove noncitizens from the United States when the no
Elizabeth Hunter v. Usedupublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ELIZABETH HUNTER; VERONICA No. 23-35174 BONIFACIO PENALES; ALEX DURON; ZAYN SILVA; RACHEL D.C. No. 6:21-cv- MOULTON; VICTORIA JOY 00474-AA BACON; HAYDEN BROWN; BROOKE C.; GARY CAMPBELL; TRISTAN CAMPBELL; NATALIE OPINION CARTER; RACHEL HELD; LAUREN HOEKSTRA; CHANDLER HORNING; JONATHAN JONES; ASHTIN MARKOWSKI; CAMERON MARTINEZ; MACKENZIE MCCANN; DARREN MCDON
Denis Zelaya v. Eric Holder, Jr.public domain
Petition for review denied in part, granted in part; vacated in part and remanded by published opinion. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS and Judge FLOYD joined. Judge FLOYD wrote a separate concurring opinion in which Judge DAVIS joined. OPINION HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge: Denis Javier Zelaya (Zelaya), a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for rev
Charles Newman Smith, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
OPINION David Puryear, Justice Charles Newman Smith, Jr., was charged with engaging in organized criminal activity by conspiring with several people to commit the offense of “unlawful delivery, dispensation, or distribution of a controlled substance, namely: four grams or more but less than 200 grams of Methamphetamine.” See Tex. Penal
People v. Cuirizpublic domain
Pollak, Acting P.J. *746Defendant Deyanira Cuiriz appeals a judgment sentencing her to imprisonment for 27 years to life following her conviction for attempted voluntary manslaughter, shooting at an occupied vehicle and mayhem. She contends that she did not voluntarily and knowingly waive her right to remain silent when she spoke to the police
People v. Cuirizpublic domain
Filed 3/13/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, A144351 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Contra Costa County v.
People v. Cuirizpublic domain
Filed 3/15/17 First modification and unmodified document attached CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, A144351 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Contra Costa Cou
People v. Cuirizpublic domain
Filed 2/14/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A144351 v. DEYANIRA CUIRIZ, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 513060
People v. Leonpublic domain
Reposted to provide correct cover page IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE LUIS LEON, Defendant and Appellant. S143531 Riverside County Superior Court RIF109916
People v. Leonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE LUIS LEON, Defendant and Appellant. S143531 Riverside County Superior Court RIF109916 January 23, 2020 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Ca
Osbaldo Gonzales v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-24-00306-CR OSBALDO GONZALES, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 286th District Court Hockley County, Texas
State v. McMillanpublic domain
Leben, J.: James McMillan’s neighbor, Milton Jamison, was found in Jamison’s mobile home, lying in a pool of blood with 56 knife wounds all over his body. Jamison and McMillan had played dominoes and drunk whiskey at Jamison’s home the night before. McMillan told the police that he went home that night and had returned in the morning to find Jamison dead. McMillan had testified that he checked Jamison’s body for vital signs, but
In Re OCEANOGRAFIA, S.A. De C v. Otto Candies, LLC, Candies Mexican Investments, and OSA Internationalpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice PERKES. 1 ’ ’ On June 11, 2014, relators Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (“Oceanografía”), Otto Candies, LLC (“Otto Candies”), Candies Mexican Investments (“Candies Mexican”), and OSA International, filed a petition for writ of ma