Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “United States v. MUKTAR”
Abdulselam v. Mukaseypublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jemal Muktar Abdulselam, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying as untimely Abdulselam’s motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Abdulselam’s motion; accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008) (“
Sandhu v. Gonzalespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Muktar Singh Sandhu is an Indian national who entered the United States without authorization, possibly arriving from Mexico in 1993 (when he apparently filed a petition for asylum that was later abandoned). He was served with a notice to appear on August 14, 2003, which charged him as being removable as an alien who arrived in the United States without authorization.
Polymath Venture Holdings LTD v. TAG Fintech, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PVH POLYMATH VENTURE ) HOLDINGS LTD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0502-BWD ) TAG FINTECH, INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) )
Mumid v. Abraham Lincoln High Schoolpublic domain
618 F.3d 789 (2010) Ibrahim MUMID; Fadumo Muse; Fahmo Ahmed; Safiya Mohamad; Iftu Jibril; Maymuna Muktar Osman; Misbah Ibrahim; Amal Mohamed; *790 Shamsa Ali Mohamed; Yarub Siyad; Muna Mohamed; Amina Harun; Mohamed A. Mohamed, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ABRAHAM LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL; The Institute for Americans; Special School District No. 1, Defendants/Appellees, Special School District No. 1, Third Party Pl
Abdi v. Dukepublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION . Petitioners Hanad Abdi and Johan Barrios Ramos (collectively, “Petitioners”) came to the United States seeking asylum. The federal government has determined that they are likely to win the right to remain in the United States due to a credible fear of ret
State v. Noorpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Noor, 2014-Ohio-3397.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 13AP-165 v. : (C.P.C. No. 12CR-01-510) Mohamed M. Noor,
Legacy Ford of McDonough, Inc. v. Michael Reynoldspublic domain
FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER, J., and SENIOR JUDGE FULLER NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 3, 2026