Cases

OPINION VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. Kenneth Mitán appeals his conviction and sentence arising out of his conduct in purchasing several business entities. He claims error in a number of respects, including government misconduct in monitoring his phone calls from prison while he was proceeding pro se and the calculation of the loss amount under the pertinent sentencing guidelines provisions. Discerning

BAUER, Chief Judge. A jury convicted W. Jason Mitán of federal tax evasion and bankruptcy fraud, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 152, respectively. Mitán appeals his conviction, arguing primarily that the district court’s treatment of his attorney denied him a fair trial. He also argues that the district court excluded certain evidence erroneously, and failed to give necessary jury instructions. Finally

Case below, 133 S.Ct. 2869.Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

334 B.R. 874 (2005) In re Emory M. DAVIS and Carol C. Davis, Debtors. Kenneth Mitan, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Emory M. Davis and Carol C. Davis, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-36611. Adversary No. 04-03322. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky. December 7, 2005. *875 *876

Appeal from Ct. App. Mich, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

BAUER, Chief Judge. A jury convicted W. Jason Mitán of federal tax evasion and bankruptcy fraud, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 152, respectively. Mitán appeals his conviction, arguing primarily that the district court’s treatment of his attorney denied him a fair trial. He also argues that the district court excluded certain evidence erroneously, and fail

Appeal from Ct. App. Mich, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM. Keith Mitán appeals the district court’s1 orders dismissing his defamation complaint with prejudice as a sanction for discovery abuses, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A), and denying post-judgment relief. Upon careful review of the record before us and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding Mitán wil

OPINION PER CURIAM. Kenneth Mitán filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the District Judge presiding over his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to recuse himself. We will deny the petition. Mitán was convicted by a jury in 2009 of federal mail and wire fraud, and related offenses. He was sentenced to 262 months in prison and restitution of more than 1.5 million

371 B.R. 244 (2007) In re Kenneth M. MITAN, Debtor. Frank J. Mitan, Appellant, v. Leonard Duval, et al., Appellee. Civ.A. No. 06-15005. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 4, 2007. *245 *246 Keith J. Mitan, Mitan & Assoc., West Bloomfield, MI, for Appel

DISSENT CLAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The bankruptcy court’s nunc pro tunc conversion order constituted a clear attempt to avoid the effect of this Court’s invalidation of the bankruptcy court’s earlier order converting the case from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7. Because I conclude that the bankruptcy court’s actions violated this Court’s mandate, I respectfully dissent from the majorit

497 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2007) Kenneth MITAN, Plaintiff, v. Doug FEENEY, et al., Defendants. No. CV 07-3086SVWJWJX. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 18, 2007. *1114 Kenneth Mitan, Pro se. James M. Burgess, Erica Suzanne Alterwitz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Doreen Feeney a

243 F.Supp.2d 719 (2003) Keneth MITAN Plaintiff v. Emory M. DAVIS and Carol C. Davis Defendants No. CIV.A. 3:00CV-841-S. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, At Louisville. February 3, 2003. *720 Keneth Mitan, West Bloomfield, MI, Pro Se. J. Fox DeMoisey, Jonathan Earl Breitenstein, DeMoisey & Smither, Louisvil