Cases

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700110 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. BRANDON E. MCKNIGHT Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

MEMORANDUM ** Joshua A. McKnight appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), McKnight’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided McKnight the opportunity t

Memorandum Opinion SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Now pending before the Court is Defendant, April McKnight’s motion to expunge her criminal record — an arrest for, and charge of, theft of government property (shoplifting). (ECF No. 10). The government did not oppose the motion for ex-pungement. (ECF No. 13). No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2011).

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shanita McKnight appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKnight v. United

570 F.3d 641 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Seante J. McKNIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-30229. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 5, 2009. *643 William J. Quinlan, Jr. (argued), New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Robin Elise Schulberg (argued), New Orleans, LA, for Defend

MEMORANDUM ** John McKnight appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights in imposing a prison term on the basis of facts neither admitted nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As McKnight concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-22-2006 USA v. McKnight Precedential or Non-Precedenti

*307 ORDER Dwight McKnight appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. Neither party has requested oral argument, and we conclude that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). McKnight pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute it, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). He was s

In the United States Court of Federal Claims LESLIE MCKNIGHT and JUSTIN BOOKER, Plaintiffs, No. 25-1091 v. Filed July 30, 2025 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Dismissing Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction Leslie McKnight and Justin

MAGILL and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, jointly concurring. We concur in all but footnote eight of Judge Lay’s majority opinion. We write separately to make explicit that possession of an identification card bearing a false social security number can, in some instances, provide a sufficient predicate for a jury to properly infer that a defendant falsely represented a social security number in violation of 42 U

Opinion of the Court EVERETT, Chief Judge: Contrary to his pleas, McKnight was convicted by military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial of violating Articles 92 and 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 892 and 912a, respectively. The sentence adjudged was a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 8 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to pay grade E-l. The conv

918 F.2d 182 U.S.v.McKnight** NO. 89-8635 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. OCT 17, 1990 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2

981 F.2d 1249 U.S.v.McKnight (Charles) NO. 92-1167 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Nov 12, 1992 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., Bechtle, J. 1 AFFIRMED.

OPINION WALLS, Senior District Judge: This case, commenced as a § 2255 action, has been peppered by Petitioner’s filings that evinced his, and has caused Respondent’s, confusion. Petitioner’s § 2255 claims will be denied, and no certificate of appealability will issue. But, as explained later, there are also three other lines of habeas claims litigated here. No habeas petitioner can challenge d

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

803 F.2d 725 U.S.v.McKnight 85-1354 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 10/14/86 1 N.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

800 F.2d 1141 U.S.v.McKnight (Robert) NO. 85-1770 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. JUL 28, 1986 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. 2 AFFIRMED.

DECISION RAICHLE, Judge: The accused was found guilty of five specifications of presenting false claims for advance travel payments, in violation of Article 132, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 932, and five specifications of larceny of the money paid to the accused by virtue of these false claims, in violation of Article 121, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 821. The specifications of the larceny charge correspond with the s