Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. MCCORMICK”
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 18-359-4 (JDB) THOMAS KENNEDY MCCORMICK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On March 3, 2020, defendant Thomas McCormick pleaded guilty to Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization (“RICO”) Conspiracy in vio
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crim. No. 18-0359 (JDB) THOMAS KENNEDY MCCORMICK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are three pretrial motions filed by defendant Thomas Kennedy McCormick: (1) a motion to dismiss for preindictme
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 18-359-4 (JDB) THOMAS KENNEDY MCCORMICK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas McCormick was indicted on December 4, 2018, on seven counts of Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C.
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700154 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. CODY S. MCCORMICK Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Darren McCormick appeals his 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. McCormick contends that his above-guidelines sentence procedurally and substantively is unreasonable. No reversible error has been shown; we affirm. In 2007, McCormick pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(iii). McCormic
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Lawson McCormick appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McCormick’s in
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
CCA 20120029. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to March 19, 2015.
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. This is a single-issue sentencing appeal in which the defendant challenges only the district court’s enhancement of her guideline sentencing range (GSR) through a two-level role-in-the-offense adjustment for leading, organizing, managing, or supervising a criminal activity. See USSG § 3Bl.l(c). Discerning no clear error in the district c
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
CCA 20120029. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to April 2, 2015.
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the district court and on the briefs and the oral arguments of the parties. Although the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion, they have been accorded full consideration by the Court. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED th
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. James T. McCormick appeals from the judgment of sentence. We will affirm. I. In May 2006, the government began investigating corruption among four members of the Pleasantville Board of Education (“PBOE”), all of whom were receiving bribes from John D’Angelo, an insurance broker with RFC Financial Services (“RFC”), in return for awarding
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** James S. McCormick appeals the 24-month term of imprisonment imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Appellant contends that the district court abused its discretion when it imposed a sentence which exceeds the recommended range provided in the Chapter 7 policy statement of the United States Sentencin
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** McCormick pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute marijuana in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, reserving, however, his right to appeal the district court’s decision that a “medical necessity” defense was unavailable to him. The district court so determined both because there was no such defense as a matter of law, and because McCormick “failed to meet the threshold requirements
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
170 F.3d 189 U.S.v.McCormick* NO. 98-8423 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. January 27, 1999 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ga. ,No.91-00078-5-CR-2-WDOM.D.Ga.
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
67 F.3d 314 U.S.v.McCormick* NO. 94-8950 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 15, 1995 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ga., No. 91-00078-CR-MAC-WDO 2</
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: Thomas Michael McCormick and Tracy L. McCormick appeal their convictions for a number of offenses arising out of the creation and use of the identity “Michael Parris Boner”. A jury convicted both of the McCor-micks of bankruptcy fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152. Thomas alone was convicted of: (1) fraudulent use of a social security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(g)(1); (2) use
McCormick v. United Statespublic domain
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States , 588 U.S. ----,
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
980 F.2d 1446 U.S.v.McCormick** NO. 91-7882 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 01, 1992 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ala. 2
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
MOLLISON, Judge: Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, the appellant was found guilty of one specification of indecent acts in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. A military judge sitting alone sentenced the appellant to be confined for a period of 18 months, to forfeit $400.00 pay per month for a period of 18 months, to be reduced to pay grade E-l, and to be discharged from the Uni
United States v. McCormickpublic domain
798 F.Supp. 203 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. John W.S. McCORMICK. Crim. A. No. 91-25-01. United States District Court, D. Vermont. July 30, 1992. *204 *205 John Conroy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Burlington, Vt., for U.S. Barry Fallick, Bobbi Sternheim, Rochman, Platzer, Fallick & Rosm