⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. MARROQUIN”

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600390 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ERICK MARROQUIN Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Navy Appella
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 683 F. App'x 291
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hugo Marroquin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Marroquin has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant po
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600390 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ERICK MARROQUIN Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 316 F. App'x 649
MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo Aramando Marroquin appeals from the nine-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Marroquin contends that the district court failed to consider whether the sentence imposed was sufficient, but not greater than necessary, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We are not persuaded
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 316 F. App'x 649
MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo Aramando Marroquin appeals from the nine-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Marroquin contends that the district court failed to consider whether the sentence imposed was sufficient, but not greater than necessary, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We are not persuaded
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 233 F. App'x 394
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonardo Marroquin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Marroquin has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Marroquin’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Acc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 177 F. App'x 532
MEMORANDUM ** Marcelo Beltran Marroquin appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Specifically, he challenges the $697,359 restitution ordered by the district court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. *533
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 177 F. App'x 532
MEMORANDUM ** Marcelo Beltran Marroquin appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Specifically, he challenges the $697,359 restitution ordered by the district court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. *533
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 205 F. App'x 628
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Marroquin-Gonzalez appeals the sentence following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b)(2). Marroquin-Gonzalez contends that the district court erred in considering his prior conviction for purposes of enhancing his sentence, in that the fact of the prior offense was ne
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-05-20 · Published · cited 0× · 98 F. App'x 679
MEMORANDUM ** Juan Marroquin-Espinoza appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Marroquin-Espinoza has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withd
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998-02-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 97-1653
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 11 F.3d 165; 1993 WL 514430
11 F.3d 165 U.S.v.Marroquin-Giron** NO. 91-3784 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 02, 1993 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 884 F.3d 302
PER CURIAM: The Court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular *303 service and not disqualified not having voted in favor ( Fed. R. Ap. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35 ), rehearing en banc is DENIED. In the en banc poll, three ju
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-03-02 · Published · cited 4× · 884 F.3d 298
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: The opinion previously issued in this case is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place: Rafael Rios Marroquin pleaded guilty to illegal reentry. He was sentenced within the 21 to 27 months Guidelines range to 25 months in prison. That range was based on a criminal history category of V, which applies to the 11 cr
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40367 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. RAFAEL RIOS MARROQUIN, also known as Tomas Andres Marroquin, Defendant - Appellant consolidated with 16-40368 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. RAFAEL RIOS MARROQUIN, Defendant - Appellant Appeals from the United S
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 874 F.3d 851
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: Rafael Rios Marroquin pleaded guilty to illegal reentry. He was sentenced within the 21 to 27 months Guidelines range to 25 months in prison. That range was based on a criminal history category of V, which applies to the 11 criminal history points assigned to Marroquin. Two of those points were for a North Carolina conviction for
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989-10-30 · Published · cited 1× · 889 F.2d 271; 1989 WL 131437
889 F.2d 271 U.S.v.Marroquin (Eric) NO. 88-6136 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. OCT 30, 1989 E.D.Tex. 885 F.2d 1240 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 80; 193 L. Ed. 2d 73; 84 U.S.L.W. 3167; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 5149
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-04-01 · Published · cited 10× · 817 F.3d 1285; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5973; 2016 WL 1273021
HULL, Circuit Judge: Defendant Eladio Marroquin-Medina appeals the district court’s order ruling on his motion for a sentence reduction.pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Marroquin-Medina’s original 72-month sentence represented a downward departure from his advisory guidelines range of 87 to 108 months based on his substantial as
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-06-26 · Published · cited 7× · 480 F. App'x 294
PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff-Appellant Noelia Tanguma-Marroquin petitioned the district court for writ of coram nobis, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and seeking to vacate her criminal conviction for one count of transporting an undocumented alien for financial gain. The district court denied the petition, finding that Appellant had failed to demonstrate prejudice under Strickland v. W