Cases

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge Now before the Court are the parties' pre-trial motions in this federal capital case for which the Court determined no hearing is required.1 Upon thorough consideration, *1192the Court makes the following rulings. BACKGROUND

PER CURIAM: Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Charles Madison, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

PER CURIAM: Bobby Ricky Madison appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a); attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1951(a); and carrying and using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of such a crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). In support of his request tha

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge WYNN joined. Judge WYNN wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote a dissenting opinion. GREGORY, Circuit Judge: Appellant Madison Duane McRae was convicted of four drug-related charges on September 14, 2005. After an unsuccessful appeal and a pro se attempt to have his sentence vacated, corrected,

ORDER While investigating Jack Curry for drug dealing, agents discovered that William Madison sometimes worked as Curry’s courier in exchange for cash or crack cocaine. In June 2008 an informant arranged to buy an ounce of crack from Curry, who said that Madison would make the delivery. The informant and an undercover agent went to Curry’s residence, where Madison got into their car and exchanged the crack for currency. Curry later stru

585 F.3d 412 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Joe MADISON, Appellee. No. 08-3878. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 23, 2009. Filed: November 6, 2009. Robert Knief, AUSA, Sioux City, IA, for appellant. Patrick Thomas Parry, Sioux City, IA, for appellee. Before RILEY, SMITH, and GRUENDER, C

998 F.2d 1020 U.S.v.Madison** NO. 92-2507 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 15, 1993 1 Appeal From: N.D.Fla. 2

781 F.Supp. 281 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Marc A. MADISON, Defendant. No. 91 Cr. 161 (RPP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 2, 1992. *282 Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y. by Jonathan N. Halpern, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for U.S. Legal Aid Soc. Criminal Defense Div., Federal Defe

744 F.Supp. 490 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, v. Marc A. MADISON, a/k/a "Stanley Johnson", Defendant. No. 90 Civ. 161 (RPP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 7, 1990. *491 Otto Obermaier, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, Jonathan N. Halpern, for U.S. Leonard F. Joy, Federal Defender Services Unit,

911 F.2d 727 U.S.v.Madison* NO. 89-4790 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JUL 31, 1990 1 Appeal From: S.D.Miss. 2

712 F.Supp. 1379 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael A. MADISON, Defendant. No. 87-CR-71-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. May 9, 1989. Daniel P. Bach, Asst. U.S. Atty., Madison, Wis., for plaintiff. Michael A. Madison, Oxford, Wis., pro se. ORDER CRABB, Chief Judge. This criminal case is before

RILEY, Circuit Judge. The district court 1 sentenced Johnny Madison to 140 months in prison after Madison pled guilty to two counts related to methamphetamine distribution. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(viii), 846. Madison appeals his sentence and contends the district court erred in three ways by: (1) oversta

DECISION BAUM, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by special court-martial in February 1982 for his part in the theft of marijuana that had been seized by *861USCGC Courageous in the performance of duly assigned law enforcement duties. Ten other Coast Guardsmen were also court-martialed for their involvement in this offense. All of the convictions an

742 F.2d 1443 U.S.v.Madison 83-1085 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. 7/13/83 1 S.D.N.Y. AFFIRMED

721 F.2d 816 U. S.v.Madison 83-4036 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 11/30/83 1 W.D.La. AFFIRMED

OPINION AND ORDER HODGES, Judge. Ms. Madison and Ms. Scott are co-owners of property located in South Carolina. They hold title to this property along with several other owners. Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging forgery, false statements, and failure to cooperate with landowners. The Complaint was based in part on information plaintiffs obtained from a Freedom of Information Act report in connection wi

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-3878 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

ORDER The parties having so agreed, it is ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).

OPINION and ORDER BLOCK, Judge. The court is faced with two post-judgment motions filed by plaintiff, Madison Services, Inc. The first, plaintiffs motion for relief from judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), represents plaintiffs third attempt to secure a government contract that it presumptively won from the Fedei'al Emergency Management A

OPINION AND ORDER BLOCK, Judge. As the once-presumptive awardee in a now-cancelled negotiated procurement by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”), plaintiff, Madison Services, Inc. (“Madison”), challenges the agency’s cancellation decision. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds FEMA’s cancellation of the procurement to be founded upon a reasonable basis, adequately documented in the