Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Lyons”
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Action No. 21-00079 v. KEVIN JAMES LYONS, Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION As a result of his criminal conduct at the United States Capitol on January 6,
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Case: 20-50307 Document: 00516193902 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jovontia D. LYONS Gas Turbine Systems Technician (Mechanical) Petty Officer Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800356 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Jud
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roderick Dwayne Lyons has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lyons has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portion
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
ORDER Anthony M. Lyons appeals his sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). He previously appealed his conviction for possession of a firearm as a felon as well as his sentence. We affirmed his conviction but, finding procedural errors in the sentence, we remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Lyons, 733 F.3d 777 (7th Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1779, 188 L.Ed
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 12-1835 12-1858 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. TODD LYONS and DANIEL EREMIAN, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Patti B.
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Todd Lyons and Daniel Eremian worked for Sports Off Shore (SOS), a gambling business based in Antigua. After a wide-ranging investigation by federal and state law enforcement of SOS and its employees and agents, and a lengthy trial, a jury convicted both Lyons and Eremian on two counts under the Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084, two counts under RICO, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and 1962(d), and one count under 18
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF FORFEITURE SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Todd Lyons and Daniel Eremian were convicted after a jury trial of racketeering conspiracy in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c); operating an il
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (d/e 15) entered by United States Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on January 6, 2012. Defendant Anthony M. Lyons filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation (d/e 16) (“Objections”) on January 20, 2012. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.Crim.P. 59(b). The Government file
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Casual Bianca Lyons seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion for new counsel on her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collater
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
726 F.Supp.2d 1359 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Antonino Eugene LYONS a/k/a Nino. Case No. 6:01-cr-134-Orl-31DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. July 20, 2010. *1360 Anita M. Cream, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tampa, FL, Ian B. Hinshelwood, U.S. Attorney's Office, Orlando,
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mario Duane Lyons appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Unit
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Casual Bianca Lyons seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certific
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Linwood Lyons appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error in the denial of Lyons’ motion, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin Percell Lyons appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Casual Bianca Lyons seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion for new counsel on her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collater
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. Omar Lyons was convicted by jury of several drug crimes involving the distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 *178U.S.C. § 841.1 He was sentenced to a term of 132 months in prison,2 ten years of probation, a $400 criminal assessment, and a f
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin Percell Lyons appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Linwood Lyons appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error in the denial of Lyons’ motion, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Steven Fion Lyons pled guilty to access device fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(5), (c) (2006) (Count One) and aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l) (2006) (Count Two). Under the properly calculated advisory Sentencing Guideline