Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction.287 II. Background.•.287 III. Law.288 A. Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum for Purposes of Federal Prosecution.•. 00 00 <M B. 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petitions for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Illegal Detention. to

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Rule 29(c)(2) Motion to Set Aside Verdict and Enter Judgment of Acquittal filed by defendant Dean Lugo Diaz [54] (“Lugo Diaz”), Docket No. 2147; and (b) United States of America’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Pr

*31ORDER One day before we heard oral arguments in this case, we released an opinion that began with this line: This appeal, like many others we see, involves a squabble over what constitutes properly considered “relevant conduct” under the federal sentencing guidelines. See United States v. Rosenberg, 585 F.3d 355 (7th

*31ORDER One day before we heard oral arguments in this case, we released an opinion that began with this line: This appeal, like many others we see, involves a squabble over what constitutes properly considered “relevant conduct” under the federal sentencing guidelines. See United States v. Rosenberg, 585 F.3d 355 (7th

MEMORANDUM ** Humberto Lugo-Martinez appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following *386his guilty-plea conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and aiding in abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

MEMORANDUM ** Elisa Lugo appeals from the 97-month sentence imposed upon remand following *616her guilty plea conviction for conspiracy, false statement to financial institution and unlawful use of means of identification, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(b), 371, 1014, and 1028(a)(7). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and vacate and

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Richard Lugo appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, in District Court of murder in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(1); murder conspiracy in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(5); and use of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii). On appeal, Lugo argues that (1) the evidence at tria

MEMORANDUM ** Perla Icela Cuevas Lugo appeals from the 210-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute over 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Appellant’s contention that the district court improperly considered

MEMORANDUM ** Elisa Lugo appeals from the 12-year sentence imposed upon remand after her guilty plea conviction to conspiracy, false statement to financial institution, and unlawful use of means of identification, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(b), 371, 1014, and 1028(a)(7). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate the sentence and remand. Lugo contends that

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Lugo-Cuevas appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Lugo-Cuevas contends that the district court clearly erred in denying a downward adjustment for mitigating role pur

MEMORANDUM ** Humberto Lugo-Martinez appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following *386his guilty-plea conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and aiding in abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

524 F.3d 5 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose R. LUGO GUERRERO, Defendant, Appellant. No. 06-2745. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 6, 2008. Decided April 16, 2008. *7 Ludwig Ortiz Belaval, for appellant. Thomas F. Klumper, Assistant United States Attorney, with wh

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Lugo-Cuevas appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Lugo-Cuevas contends that the district court clearly erred in denying a downward adjustment for mitigating role pur

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part, and that case be and it hereby is REMANDED. Defendants-appellants Daniel Lugo, Darryl Tyler, Michael McMillan, and Kenneth A. Watson (collectively, “defendants”) appeal their convictions for a variety of offenses on a number of grounds, and also assert that

361 F.Supp.2d 91 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, v. Daniel LUGO, Darryl Tyler, Michael McMillan, and Kenneth A. Watson, Defendants. No. 01-CR-922. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 24, 2005. Kim P. Bonstrom, Bonstrom & Murphy, New York City, Louis M. Freeman, Freeman, Nooter & Ginsberg, Richard Jasper, Esq., Kenneth A. Paul, Avraham C. Mosk

ORDER HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Movant Martin Lugo-Lopez pleaded guilty to the offense of illegal reentry of a previously deported alien, see 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and was sentenced to 34 months’ confinement. He filed a motion to set aside his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The mot

PER CURIAM:1 IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed motion of appellee to vacate the sentence is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unopposed motion of appellee to remand case to the district court for resentencing is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unopposed motion of appellee for a 14 day extension of time to file appellees brief is DENIED AS UNNEC

289 F.Supp.2d 790 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Rafael Nambo LUGO. Criminal No. B-03-M-2677-1. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division. October 23, 2003. *791 Jeff Wilde, Federal Public Defender's Office, Brownsville, TX, for Defendant. Terra Bay, AUSA, Brownsville, TX, for Government. <

MEMORANDUM ** Victor Lugo-Bueno appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawfully entering the United States after having been previously deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lugo-Bueno’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b) remains foreclosed after United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 6

*255MEMORANDUM * Lugo appeals from the judgment entered by the district court following her conviction by a jury of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952, and 960(b), for possession with intent to distribute and knowing and intentional importation of 42.5 kilograms of marijuana. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we ha