Cases

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Luciano Camberos-Villapuda was charged with conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. 'Before trial, he moved to suppress evidence seized and statements he made during a search in Denver, Colorado. The district court 1 den

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez was convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) as an alien unlawfully present in the United States following deportation. He appeals his sentence of 70 months of imprisonment, contending that the district court erred in concluding that his prior state-court conviction for conspiracy to commit murder warranted a 16-level

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This appeal focuses on the district court’s finding that defendant-appellant Ernesto Luciano used a weapon in connection with an assault, triggering a four-level sentencing enhancement. Although Luciano pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), during sentencing he objected to the enhancement and den

LEVAL, Circuit Judge. The Government appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court *148for the District of Connecticut (Dorsey, J.) granting a writ of habeas corpus to Frank Michael Parise pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and reducing his sentence from 240 months imprisonment to 192 months. Parise was convicted of conspiracy to possess cocaine in violatio

DENNIS, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Domingo Luciano-Rodriguez appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted illegal reentry following a prior deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Luciano-Rodriguez claims that the district court erred in enhancing his base offense level based on a finding that his prior conviction for sexual assault constituted a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Luciano-Rodr

LOKEN, Chief Judge. After a jury convicted Luciano Martinez-Figueroa of conspiracy to distribute and possession with the intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, the district court ** sentenced him to 97 months in prison. Martinez-Figueroa appealed his conviction, raising two eviden-tiary issues. We

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Immediately after a buy-and-bust sting, government agents conducted a warrant-less search of defendant-appellant Raul Luciano’s “stash house” and found a sizable quantity of heroin, drug paraphernalia, and two 9mm handguns. Later, a two-count indictment issued, charging Luciano with possession with intent to distribute over 100 grams of heroin, see

PER CURIAM: Defendants-appellants Frank Michael Parise and Juan Cintron mount a number of challenges to their convictions and sentences. By summary order issued today, we have addressed all but one of their claims. We publish to address Parise’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The conduct of Parise’s trial counsel was unprofessional, but we find that Parise suffered no prejudice within the meaning o

57 F.3d 1063 U.S.v.Luciano NO. 94-1390 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. May 18, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y.92-cr-1008 1 AFFIRMED.

90 F.Supp.2d 171 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ramon LUCIANO DEL ROSARIO, Defendant. No. Crim. 99-097(JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 25, 2000. *172 Guillermo Gil, U.S. Attorney, Timothy Vasquez, Asst. U.S. Attorney, San Juan, PR, for plaintiff. Rafael F. Castro-Lang, San Juan,

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. At 2:45 a.m. on March 27, 1991, in the darkness of the night over a Puerto Rico beach, government flares brightened the sky as waiting police and customs officers surprised and arrested six men offloading eight bales of cocaine from two yawls. The men had brought 232.8 kilograms of cocaine to this country from Colombia. Others involved were arrested on la

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Luciano Sorrentino appeals from his conviction by a jury before Judge Raggi for possession as a convicted felon of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and posses *296 sion of counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473. He raises numerous claims of error,

OPINION AND ORDER LOVELL, District Judge. Defendant Luciano moves the court for an order suppressing evidence seized by the government pursuant to a search warrant issued January 24, 1990. Defendant bases his motion on three grounds. First, Defendant contends that the search warrant was issued as a result of Agent Steven J. MacKinnon’s intentional or reckless misrepresentations of the facts known to him to

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Luciano Lucas Amaya appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a drug search of his car. We affirm. I. On August 27, 1993, an unidentified caller to the Arkansas narcotics hotline reported a cocaine

Jurisdiction; Taking; Accrual of Claim; Statute of Limitations OPINION Merow, Senior Judge On July 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that the defendant had exacted takings of his water rights and property adjacent to the Plumas National Forest, in Plu-mas County, California. See Doc. 1, This

992 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. U

768 F.2d 1351 *U.S.v.Luciano 84-3809 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 7/11/85 1 M.D.Fla. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

SOROKIN, District Judge. After pleading guilty to one count of possession of child pornography, appellant Nelson Vélezr-Lueiano (‘Vélez-Luciano”) received a sentence of ten years in prison followed by fifteen years of supervised release. The terms of his supervised release included multiple conditions, some of which he challenges in this appeal. Because Vé-lez-Luciano’s plea agree

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.