Cases

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

RENDERED: FEBRUARY 20, 2025 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2024-SC-0005-DG LOUISVILLE HISTORICAL LEAGUE, INC. APPELLANT ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NOS. 2023-CA-0082 & 0134 JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT NO. 21-CI-02393 LOUISVILLE/JEFFERS

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied. Same case below, 317 S.W.3d 23.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER David J. Hale, Judge This case centers orí a dispute over- access to utility poles in Louisville, Kentucky. In February 2016, the Louisville Metro Council enacted a “one-touch make-ready” ordinance outlining new procedures for the installation of communications networks on utility poles in the city. Make-ready work generally consists of moving or rearranging existing wires- an

WRIGHT, J„ DISSENTING:: I respectfully dissent from the majority and would affirm the Jefferson Circuit Court. As the majority points out, § 156b of the Kentucky Constitution states that: “[t]he General Assembly may provide by general law that cities may exercise any power and perform any function within their boundaries that is in furtherance of a public purpose of a city and not in conflict with a constituti

662 F.3d 723 (2011) James O'NEILL and Angela O'Neill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT; Louisville Metro Animal Services; Gilles Meloche, in his individual and official capacities; Wayne Zelinsky, in his individual and official capacities; Terry Pendleton, in her individual and official capacities; and Unknown Defendants, John and/or Jane Does, in his/ her/their individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

326 S.W.3d 1 (2009) METRO LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY GOVERNMENT[1] and the City of Louisville, Appellants, v. Shawn ABMA, and Other Individual Appellees as Designated in the Notice of Appeal. and Robert Akridge, and Other Individual Cross-Appellants as Designated in the Notice of Appeal, Cross-Appellants, v. City of Louisville, (Now Known as Metro Louisville/Jefferson County Government), Cross-Appellees.

260 S.W.3d 777 (2008) Christie RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, Appellee. No. 2006-SC-000502-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. June 19, 2008. Rehearing Denied September 18, 2008. *778 J. Key Schoen, Sales, Tillman, Wallbaum, Catlett & Satterley, PLLC, Louisville, KY, Counse

Opinion of the Court By Justice SCOTT. This appeal arises from a challenge by O’Shea’s-Baxter, LLC, d/b/a Flanagan’s Ale House (Flanagan’s) to an order of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC Board) upholding the Louisville/Jefferson County Government’s (Louisville Metro) denial of Flanagan’s’s application for a retail drink license. The issues involved in the present action concern KRS 241.075, which pro

527 F.Supp.2d 713 (2007) Mary OBERHAUSEN, et al., Plaintiffs v. LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:07CV-198-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. December 19, 2007. *714 *715 David B. Mour, Joseph C. Souza, Ruby

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Bert Williams, Jr. and Bert Williams, Sr., sued a number of defendants, including Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government (“Louisville Metro”) and more than twenty Louisville Metro police officers (collectively, “Defendants”) over a series of raids and arrests occurring at or near their business, Plaintiff Phat’s Bar &a;

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0050p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JEFFREY DEWAYNE CLARK, │

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCHRODER. This Court granted discretionary review of a Court of Appeals opinion adjudging that the Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government’s 2004 amendments to its code of ordinances, which placed numerous restrictions on adult entertainment businesses in the Metro area, were constitutional. Having considered the record and arguments of counsel, we adjudge that all of the rest

400 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2005) John C. TAYLOR Plaintiff v. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, et al. Defendants No. CIV.A. 304CV122S. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, At Louisville. June 14, 2005. *1015 Suzanne D. Cordery, Jefferson County Attorney, Louisville, KY, for Louisville Metro Government, Defendant.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0111p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PERCY DWAYNE BROWN, │ Plain

590 F.3d 381 (2009) LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT and Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOTELS.COM, L.P. et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 08-6302, 08-6303. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 14, 2009. Decided and Filed: December 22, 2009. *3

270 S.W.3d 904 (2008) JEWISH HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, Appellee. No. 2008-CA-000095-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. November 14, 2008. *906 Douglas C. Ballantine, Justin D. Clark, Louisville, KY, for appellant. I.G. Spencer, Jr., B. Frank Radmacher, II

(2008) BIG MOMMA'S SOUL KITCHEN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-209-C. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. March 12, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JENNIFER B. COFFMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the defe

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0272p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ SISTERS FOR LIFE, INC., ANGELA MINTER, and KENTUCKY │ RIGHT TO LIF

252 F.Supp.2d 406 (2003) CAM I, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT (Successor in Interest to Jefferson County Fiscal Court), Defendant. Civil Action No. 3.02CV-715-S. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. March 21, 2003. *407 C. Michael Hatzell, Louisville, KY, for plai