Cases

EBEL, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to apply Fourth Amendment principles to a situation where a police officer executing a warrant to search an electronic storage device for evidence of one crime discovers evidence of other criminal activity. Here, while executing a warrant to search Jason Loera's home for evidence of computer fraud, FBI agents discovered child pornography on f

COGAN, District Judge. Defendant has filed two motions to suppress evidence as the fruit of illegal searches and seizures. The first motion concerns evidence obtained from defendant's communication network located on servers in the Netherlands. The second relates to evidence obtained from his FlexiSpy spyware accounts located on servers in the United States. For the reasons given below, defendant's motions are denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ' James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider *1180Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doc. 62] on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 35], filed March 8, 2016 (Doc. 109)(“Motion to Reconsider”). The Court

ORDER Honorable G. Murray Snow, United States District Judge ' Pending before the Court is Mr. Júlian Loera’s appeal from the judgment of United States Magistrate Judge Mark Aspey denying Loera’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on his claimed Indian status. (Mag. Doc. 29.)1 For the following reasons, the Court affirms. BACKGROUND

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed March 7, 2014 (Doc. 35) (“Motion”). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on May 20, 2014, and May 21, 2014. The Court heard the parties’ arguments on the Motion on August 19, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Jason Loera may

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARK E. ASPEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion (Doc. 10) to dismiss the charge against him, alleging an assault by striking, beating or wounding, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(4) and 18 U.S.C. § 1152, a Class B misdemeanor also referred to as a petty offense.1 Defendant’s motion and the govern

565 F.3d 406 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose J. LOERA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2324. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 1, 2009. Decided May 15, 2009. *408 Jacqueline Jacobs, Attorney (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN, for

MEMORANDUM ** Rogelio Loera-Vasquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 71-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentence enhancement pursuant to § 1326(b). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Loera-Vasquez has filed a brief stating that he finds no g

PER CURIAM.* Ruben Loera-Garcia appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Loera-Garcia contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under the les

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1013 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:13-cr-01123- SPL-1 v. ROBERTO GONZALEZ-LOERA, OPINION Defenda

*418Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

19-2239-cr United States of America v. Beltran-Leyva (Guzman Loera) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2021 Argued: October 25, 2021 Decided: January 25, 2022 Docket No. 19-2239 ------------------------------------------ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, V. JOAQUIN A

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM. Appellant Jose Hernandez-Loera pled guilty to one count of unlawful use of identification documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546 (a). The district court 1 sentence

620 F.2d 311 U. S.v.Loera-Rubalcava 80-1164 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 4/14/80 1 N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Jose Loera, asks us to set aside his conviction on the ground that his trial lawyer had been ineffective. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Loera had been indicted back in 2005 on drug charges. In response to a motion to suppress, the judge had forbidden the government to offer evidence of what the petitioner had told DEA agents after he allegedly as

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-2324 U NITED STATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE J. L OERA, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. No. 07 CR 25—Phil

PER CURIAM:1 IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to remand the case to District Court for resentencing is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s alternative unopposed motion to extend time to file the Appellee’s supplemental brief until f

ORDER The government has moved to remand this case in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Judulang v. Holder, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 476, 181 L.Ed.2d 449 (2011). Because the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision rested solely on Matter of Blake, 23 I. & N. Dec. 722 (BIA 2005), we agree with the government that “remand of this case to the Bo

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.