Cases

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Roberto Ivan Li-zarraga-Carrizales (“Lizarraga”) appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 (the “federal offense”). Lizarraga claims that the district court improperly engaged in judicial fact-finding in denying him safet

MEMORANDUM ** Omar Lizarraga-Cedano appeals from his conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Lizarraga-Cedano argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. However, he fails to detail the elements of the crime he believes were not establishe

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 4, 2005 TENTH CIRCUIT

ORDER ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Appellant Jose Rolando Lizarraga-Orduno pled guilty to reentry of a deported alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1) and (b)(2). See United States v. Lizarraga-Orduno, 118 Fed.Appx. 439 (10th Cir. 2004) (unpublished op.) (Lizarraga-Orduno I), vacated and remanded, <

MEMORANDUM** Francisco Javier Lizarraga appeals the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for importing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Lizarraga contends that the district court’s instructions to the grand jury violated his Fifth Amendment right to a g

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* BRORBY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Appellant Jose Rolando Lizarraga-Or

MEMORANDUM ** Valentina Lizarraga appeals from her guilty plea conviction and 120-month sentence imposed for importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(b)(1)(B)(ii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lizarraga’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as coun

*258MEMORANDUM ** Heraclio Lizarraga-Rodriguez appeals his guilty plea conviction and the 61-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lizarraga-Rodriguez’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground th

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

OPINION KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: Plotting coordinates on a map used to require a sextant, a compass and quite a bit of- skill. Today, anyone can do it with a few clicks of the mouse. This appeal raises a question born of that newfound technological prowess: Are a Google Earth satellite image and a digital “tack” labeled with GPS coordinates hearsay?

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

554 F.2d 1071 U. S.v.Lizarraga-Lizarraga No. 77-1229 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 5/19/77 1 D.Ariz. APPEAL DISMISSED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

562 F.2d 56 U. S.v.Lizarraga-Lizarraga No. 77-1229 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 7/15/77 1 D.Ariz. PETITION DENIED