⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Lister”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-4304 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TONY M. LISTER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 94-40549 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L.C. LISTER, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _______
Lister v. McGinleypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 172; 202 L. Ed. 2d 106
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 234; 196 L. Ed. 2d 181; 85 U.S.L.W. 3146; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5676
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 873
C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-11-28 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 545; 85 U.S.L.W. 3261; 196 L. Ed. 2d 440; 2016 WL 6923257; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6996
Petition for rehearing denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 873; 125 S. Ct. 104
543 U.S. 873 LISTERv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-110. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 2004. 1 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 77 Fed. Appx. 465.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005-12-28 · Published · cited 31× · 432 F.3d 754; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28782; 2005 WL 3534193
BAUER, Circuit Judge. Tony M. Lister pleaded guilty to one count of distribution of a controlled substance, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), after arranging for the sale of more than five grams of cocaine base to a government agent. In his pre-sentencing interview, Lister admitted to trafficking at least 1.8 kilograms of cocaine base over the course of the four years prior to his arrest.
Lister v. Astruepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 566 U.S. 1026; 132 S. Ct. 2691
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 482 F. Supp. 2d 1003; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23804; 2007 WL 1027582
482 F.Supp.2d 1003 (2007) Gary A. LISTER, Plaintiff, v. DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:05-CV-495. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 30, 2007. *1004 Joseph J. Platt, Cincinnati, OH, Joel L. Oster, Kevin Theriot, Alliance Defense Fund, Leawood, KS, for Plaintiff. Christophe
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995-05-05 · Published · cited 53× · 53 F.3d 66; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10449; 1995 WL 283765
PER CURIAM: L.C. Lister, Jr. appeals from the sentencing determination of the district court, arguing that an obstruction of justice enhancement was improperly applied and that an acceptance of responsibility deduction was improperly denied. We affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Supreme Court of the United States · 1984-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 469 U.S. 857; 105 S. Ct. 186; 53 U.S.L.W. 3239; 83 L. Ed. 2d 119; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 3606
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 730 F. 2d 683.
In re Listerpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018-09-25 · Published · cited 4× · 593 B.R. 587
Beth A. Buchanan, United States Bankruptcy Judge U.S. Bank Trust, NA (the "Creditor") argues that the proposed cramdown of the Creditor's secured claim by Debtors Amy and James Lister ("Debtors") in their chapter 13 plan [Docket Number 17] is prohibited by the anti-modification provision of 11 U.S.C. § 1322
Lister v. Starkpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 498 U.S. 1011
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LATONIA W. LISTER, No. 24-3933 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-00589- CDS-MDC v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS, OPINION D
Lister v. Starkpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 498 U.S. 1011; 111 S. Ct. 579
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2018-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 318 F. Supp. 3d 1221
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, United States District Judge This case is about Donald Henderson, a former serviceman who was injured in an accident while in the military. The Government does not contest that Mr. Henderson qualified for ongoing benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs as a result of the permanent injuries that he suffered in the accident. However, the Government challenges the amount of the benefits that Mr. Hender
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2016-06-28 · Published · cited 1× · 192 F. Supp. 3d 1153; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92740; 2016 WL 3619640
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION TO VACATE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED ROBERT H. WHALEY, Senior United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence and for Immediate Release. ECF No. 58. The Court heard oral argument on June 22, 2016. Mr. Ladwig was represented by Alison Guernsey of the Federal Defenders of
Lister v. Petersonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 500 F. App'x 296
PER CURIAM: * Oliver Eshman Lister, II, Texas prisoner # 1279188, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. He argues in his one-page brief that he is entitled to proceed IFP because he did so in the district court and because the interests of justice require it. Th
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-08-19 · Published · cited 1× · 122 Fed. Cl. 761; 2015 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1062; 2015 WL 4966877
Pro Se Plaintiff; Breach of Contract; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Privity of Contract; Election of Forum; Statute of Limitations OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT On January 20, 2015, Donald A Woodruff together with The DuckeGroupe, LLC,