Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Linscomb”
United States v. Linscombpublic domain
56 F.3d 1386 U.S.v.Linscomb NO. 94-10594 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 26, 1995 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 4:93-CR-49-E(2) 2 AFFIRMED.
Linscomb v. United Statespublic domain
*1193ante, p. 1103; ante, p. 1104; 519 U. S. 1098; 519 U. S. 1082; 519 U. S. 1152; 519 U. S. 1153; ante, p. 1106; 519 U. S. 1134; *1194No. 96-7306.
Linscomb v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Linscomb v. United Statespublic domain
*1193ante, p. 1103; ante, p. 1104; 519 U. S. 1098; 519 U. S. 1082; 519 U. S. 1152; 519 U. S. 1153; ante, p. 1106; 519 U. S. 1134; *1194No. 96-7306.
Linscomb v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Abraham Michael Linscomb v. State of Texaspublic domain
NO. 07-01-0165-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 16, 2002 ______________________________ ABRAHAM MICHAEL LI
Abraham Michael Linscomb v. State of Texaspublic domain
NO. 07-01-0165-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 16, 2002 ______________________________ ABRAHAM MICHAEL LINSCOMB, APPELLANT
Linscomb v. Statepublic domain
*165OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW BENAVIDES, Judge. Appellant was convicted of delivering cocaine in violation of the Texas Controlled Substances Act.1 His punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, was assessed at imprisonment for 45 years.2 On appeal, he
Abraham Michael Linscomb v. State of Texaspublic domain
NO. 07-01-0165-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 16, 2002 ______________________________ ABRAHAM MICHAEL LINSCOMB, APPELLANT V. TH
United States v. Popepublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CO-1094 UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. KHALIL K. POPE, APP
Linscomb v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incpublic domain
47 F.3d 424 Linscombv.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. NO. 94-40140 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 25, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.Tex., No. 1:91-CV-554 1 REMANDED.
United States v. Goochpublic domain
Judge BAKER delivered the opinion of the Court. At a general court-martial convened at Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas, a panel composed of officer members convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of making a false official statement, three specifications of engaging in conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, and one specification of fraternization, in violation of Articles 107, 13
Chappell v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAUGHREY, District Judge. These consolidated cases concern the ownership of $82,000 found in a 1995 Volkswagen Golf titled in the name of Helen Chappell. The United States Government asserts that the $82,000 came from illegal drug sales and should be forfeited to the Government. The Chappells contend that the $82,000 belongs to them because it was found in the gas tank of a car which
Battista v. United Statespublic domain
889 F.Supp. 716 (1995) Ronald BATTISTA and Arlene Battista, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 92 Civ. 1424 (AGS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 31, 1995. *717 *718 Schneider, Kleinick & Weitz, P.C., New York City, for plaintiffs. Mary Jo Whit
United States v. Doyle Marshall Willey, Sr.public domain
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Doyle Marshall Willey (Willey) appeals his convictions on thirty-one counts of bankruptcy fraud, conspiracy to commit bankruptcy fraud, aiding and abetting the making of a false statement on a loan application, aiding and abetting the concealment of assets from the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),
Linscomb v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Incpublic domain
GARDNER, Chief Judge. This was an action in replevin brought by the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., against Irven E. Linscomb, Gilbert Jackson and Lewis E. Selders to recover possession of a miscellaneous assortment of automobile, truck, bus, and tractor tires and tubes claiming the right to the immediate possession of sai
Katsaris v. United Statespublic domain
499 F.Supp. 282 (1980) William Kenneth KATSARIS, Sheriff of Leon County v. The UNITED STATES of America, Leon County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Jose Luis Acosta, and Luis Fulgencio Bosch. No. 79-0946. United States District Court, N. D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. September 15, 1980. Ronald A. Labasky, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff.
United States v. Puritepublic domain
DECISION EARLY, Senior Judge: Tried by general court-martial, the accused was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of an attempt to steal mail and stealing mail, and, despite his pleas, of desertion, stealing a cassette recorder and possession of marijuana, in violation of Article^ 80, 85, 121 and 134, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 885, 921, 934. The approved sentence exte
United States v. Boswellpublic domain
PAIR, Associate Judge (dissenting): I cannot agree with my colleagues that there was any unconstitutional search and seizure in this case. It seems to me that in determining the legality of the alleged search and seizure, three questions are presented: (1) whether there was in fact and in law an abandonment of the property in question, (2) whether the hallway where the alleged search and se
Peyton v. United Statespublic domain
275 A.2d 229 (1971) Marshall PEYTON, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 5442. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted February 23, 1971. Decided March 22, 1971. Michael L. Glaser, Washington, D. C., appointed by this court, for appellant. Thomas A. Flannery, U. S. Atty., with whom John A. Terry, C. Madison Brewer and Joh