Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Lindley”
United States v. Lindleypublic domain
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Appellants Daniel Appolon (“Daniel”), Ernst Appolon (“Ernst”), Latoya Haltiwanger, J. Daniel Lindley, and Eric L. Levine were players in the Boston real estate market. Along with six coconspirators, appellants devised and executed a mortgage fraud scheme which netted them illegal profits of nearly $2 million between May 2005 and June 2006. The scheme itself w
United States v. Lindley T. Geborde, AKA Seal Apublic domain
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge: Defendant Lindley Geborde manufactured and gave away to several teenagers a home-made designer drug called gamma hydroxy butyrate, commonly known as GHB. Geborde’s concoction killed one of the teenage boys who drank the stuff. Geborde was convicted- of manslaughter in state court and sentenced to prison. The present case involves the efforts of federal
United States v. Lindleypublic domain
851 F.2d 358 U.S.v.Lindley* NO. 87-1776 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JUN 23, 1988 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2
Lindley v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Lindleypublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.
United States v. Thomas Lindley Robertspublic domain
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: Thomas Lindley Roberts has appealed his conviction and resulting five-year provisional sentence for sending a threatening letter to Justice O’Connor of the United States Supreme Court. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his con *890 viction and that the
United States v. Gary Lindleypublic domain
PER CURIAM. Defendant Gary Lindley appeals his conviction for attempting to escape from the Lompoc Federal Penitentiary in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751 (1982). His sole contention on appeal is that the district court erred in finding him competent to stand trial. We affirm the conviction because the district court’s determination that Lindley was competent
Lindley v. Cisnerospublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellants are former tenants in a multistory apartment building known as the Mandalay Shores Apartments located in Clear-water, Florida. At the time appellants were tenants, the apartment building was owned by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”); each appellant occupied his or her apartment under a lease with HUD. In this action a
Lindley v. Lindley (In Re Lindley)public domain
121 B.R. 81 (1990) In re Larry Joe LINDLEY, Debtor, Carol Ann LINDLEY and Fred W. Woodson, Plaintiffs, v. Larry Joe LINDLEY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 89-00794-C, Adv. No. 89-0134-C. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma. October 23, 1990. *82 *83 Clifford A. Jones, Oklaho
People v. Lindleypublic domain
*306OPINION AND DECISION IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(c) I. SUMMARY Respondent abandoned three clients, converted funds, and then failed to participate in the resulting disciplinary proceedings. Absent significant mitigating factors, disbarment is generally appropriate when an attorney knowingly converts client funds or abandons clients, causing the
Ivan Pena v. Stephen Lindleypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IVAN PENA; ROY VARGAS; DONA No. 15-15449 CROSTON; BRETT THOMAS; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; D.C. No. CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., 2:09-cv-01185- Plaintiffs-Appellants, KJM-CKD v. OPINION STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms,
Ewing v. Lindleypublic domain
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ohio dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
City of Philadelphia v. Lindley Tower Realty Co., L.P. ~ Appeal of: Lindley Tower Realty Co., L.P.public domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA City of Philadelphia : : v. : : Lindley Tower Realty Co., L.P., : Old Lindley Corporation, Philip C. : Pulley, SBG Management Services : PA, Inc., YRP-Yurt IV LLC, Pacific : Western Bank, and Paul Early : : Appeal of: Lindley Tower Realty : Co., L.P., Old Li
Lindley v. McKnightpublic domain
349 S.W.3d 113 (2011) Elizabeth Ann LINDLEY, not individually, but solely in her capacity as Independent Executor of the Estate of Nan Daws, Deceased, Appellant, v. J. Ross McKNIGHT, Paul Cowan, Pryor Cowan, Jeff M. Glazner, Janice A. Glazner, John E. Gray, Raelynn Gray, William T. Hannis, Kobye Hannis, Scott Harris, Linda Harris, William H. Henson, Dee Ann Henson, Edwin M. Hinson, Susan K. Hinson, Jack B. Horne, Carole Horne, Pascal J. Hosch, Jo
American Koyo Corp. v. Lindleypublic domain
Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.
Lindley v. Federal Deposit Insurancepublic domain
MARTIN, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated appeal of six orders from the Southern District of Georgia denying motions for remand to state court, granting summary judgment to the FDIC on federal claims, and refusing to exercise supplementary jurisdiction over remaining state law claims against other defendants. After careful review, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the District Court’s denial of reman
Arlena Lindley v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ARLENA LINDLEY, No. 08-08-00149-CR § Appellant, Appeal from
State ex rel. Robison v. Lindley-Myerspublic domain
W. Brent Powell, Judge Bryan Travis Robison appeals the circuit court's judgment quashing its preliminary writ in mandamus and denying Robison's request for a permanent writ against the director of the Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions, and Professional Registration.1 This Court affirms the circuit court's judgment because Robison failed to demonstrate he was entitled to mandamus relief.
Arlena Lindley v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ARLENA LINDLEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. § §
Lindley v. Life Investors Insurancepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER PAUL J. CLEARY, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Documents Identified Nos. 1-386 on Defendant’s Consolidated Privilege Log (Dkt. #222); Plaintiffs Sixth Motion to Compel Information Concerning Defendant’s Knowledge and Consideration of “Actual Charges” (Dkt. # 156); Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order from Request No. 40 of Pl