Cases

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Ralph B. Kirscher, Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge At Butte in said District this 16th day of December, 2015. In this adversary proceeding, the Plaintiff Molly Schwarz (“Molly” or “Plaintiff’) seeks, denial of the Debtor/Defendant Marc Andreas Liechti’s (“Liechti” or “Debtor”) discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A) for knowingly and fraudulently making a false oath or

ORDER Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge, United States District Court Appellant Marc Andreas Liechti (“Liechti”) appeals from the judgment entered against him by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana in favor of Molly Schwarz (“Schwarz”), a creditor in the underlying bankruptcy case. The Honorable Ralph B. Kirscher, Chief Judge for the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Mont

(2008) Jack M. HOROVITZ, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES (INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE), Defendant, v. Jack T. Constantino, Third-Party Defendant. No. 2:06-cv-279. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 11, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are cross-

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, United States Magistrate Judge. The United States filed a Motion for Physical Examination of the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff objected to Dr. Colin W. Hamilton conducting the medical examination and stated that he would submit to a physical examination by any other ortho-paedic surgeon in the region. The plaintiff c

GILBERT, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff in error was convicted under an indictment which charged that on “divers dates between the *7251st day of January, .1918, and the 6th day of May, 1918,” at Sacramento, Cal., he did “then and there unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly attempt to cause insubordination, disloyalty, and refusal of^ duty in the military and naval forces of

RIVES, Circuit Judge (dissenting): I respectfully dissent. Near the beginning of the majority opinion, my colleagues “sketch some of the facts showing how the defendants operated.” The “facts” so sketched are damning. They show the defendants to be guilty of extortion and leave little doubt as to their interference with commerce. I assume, how

COWEN, Chief Judge. This is a suit for refund of federal income taxes. The issues are before us on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The facts are quite simple and may be briefly summarized. Plaintiff is a citizen of the United States. For the taxable year in question, 1964, she was a resident of Spai

GEE, Circuit Judge: Again before us come Patty McClain, Mike Bradshaw, Ada Simpson and William Simpson, challenging their second round of convictions for having received, concealed and/or sold stolen goods in interstate or foreign commerce and also for conspiracy to do the same, violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2314 and 2315. The go

141 F.Supp. 35 (1956) Herbert Miles HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY, Defendant. United States District Court S. D. New York. May 18, 1956. David Haar, New York City, for plaintiff. Burlingham, Hupper & Kennedy, New York City, Eugene Underwood, William *36 M. Kimball, Gerard Harrington, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for d

187 F.Supp.2d 1288 (2002) William Vance TURNER, Plaintiff, v. Officer Roderick SCHULTZ, Officer Michael Lavallee, Officer James Bond, Lieutenant David D. Armstrong, Lieutenant FNU King, Captain M. Mooneyham, Assistant Warden Greco, Warden Joel H. Knowles, Lieutenant Rowe, Lieutenant K. Scott, Officer E. Wildergrube, Officer T. Martinez, Charolette Gutierrez, Captain Terry Hines, and Other Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendant

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S AMENDED COMPLAINT TO REVOKE DISCHARGE (DOC. NO. 4) Judge Caldwell This Memorandum Opinion and Order serves as the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law for the United States Trustee’s Amended Complaint to Revoke Discharge (Plaintiff), and the Answer filed by the Debtor, John E. Fonner (Defenda

MELANSON, Judge. The State of Idaho appeals from the district court’s order granting Troy Edwin Liechty’s motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE The following facts were revealed at the hearing on the motion to suppress. On the morning of March 15, 2010, a patrol officer observed a vehicle parked along the side of the

#30777-aff in pt & rev in pt-SPM 2025 S.D. 44 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** KYLEA WAGNER, Petitioner and Appellee, v. RIGO TOVAR, Respondent and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SE

DALE A. KIMBALL, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Corey Johnson's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. The parties fully briefed the motion on an expedited basis, and, on June 27, 2018, the court held an expedited hearing on the motion. At the hearing, Plaintiff was represented by Angela H. Elmore, and Defendants were represented by Kyle J. Kaiser and Darin B. Go

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge In this wrongful termination case, Plaintiff Anastasia Vercos alleges she .was terminated from employment with El Paso County, Colorado in retaliation for reporting misuse of federal funds. She brings claims against Defendants, the Board of County Commissioners of El Paso County, Jim Reid, R.C. Smith, and Jerry Cordova (tog

603 F.3d 1142 (2010) Leyda Santalibrada CUELLAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard Cecil JOYCE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 09-35068. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 7, 2010. Sander Bak, Kevin M. Ashby and Robert R. Miller, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCoy LLP, New York, NY; Michael Anderson, Anderson & Liechty, P.C., Billings, MT, for the petit

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1492 Filed August 1, 2018 DIANA VERDUGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. LEE COUNTY, IOWA, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lee (South) County, Michael J. Schilling, Judge. A plaintiff appeals the district court judge’s denial of a motion for recusal. A

Opinion by JUDGE TERRY T1 In this tort action, plaintiff, Kirk Williams, appeals the order of the district court dismissing his suit against defendant, Crop Production Services, Inc. Plaintiff filed the complaint two years and one day after the acerual date, and urges us to apply C.R.C.P. 6(a)(1) in computing the two-year statute of limitations period for tort actions under section 13-80-102(1)(a), C.R.S.20

Najam, Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Towne & Terrace Corporation; Glen Timmons, in his capacity as President of the Towne & Terrace Corporation Board of Directors; Darren Kirkland, in his Capacity as a Member of the Towne & Terrace Corporation Board of Directors; Jacqueline Timmons, in her Capacity as a Member of the Towne & T

FILED May 12 2023, 8:47 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals