Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1584 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LOUIS GARDNER, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Be

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-4528 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WILLIAM TREVOR SOLOFF, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00502-D-1) Arg

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2111 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Veronica Del Carmen Pineda De Aquino

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50268 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cr-00421- BEN-2 SEGUNDO MARCIAL DOMINGUEZ- CAICEDO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50271 Plaintiff-Appellee,

FRIEDMAN, District Judge: ORDER The opinion filed on March 14, 2017 is amended as follows: On page 896, paragraphs 2-3 remove and replace with . On page 896, paragraph 3 after cunder-took the search. > add <The district court erred in denying Job’s motions to suppress evidence from all three searches solely on the ba

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *23Presently before the Court is Defendant Jose Amaya-Ortiz's pro se [356] Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Feder

/ Nl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V' Criminal No. 12-cr-125-17 (CKK) JOSE AMAYA-ORTIZ, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 3, 2017) Presently before the Court is Defendant Jose Amaya-Ortiz’ s pro se [356] Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, which the Government opposes. Defendant Jose Amaya-Ortiz (hereinafter “Defendant” or “Mr. Amaya- Ortiz”) requests tha

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50472 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:13-cr-1128-BEN-11 TRAVIS JOB, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

OPINION FRIEDMAN, District Judge: Travis Job appeals from his conviction after a jury trial on two drug-related offenses: (1) conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and (2) possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and his sentence of 365 months, followed b

676 F.3d 491 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dale Allen RICHARDSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-40244. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 30, 2012. *495 Renata Ann Gowie, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. *496

782 F.Supp.2d 1238 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert Andrew BLECHMAN and Michael N. Sofris, Defendants. No. 10-40095-01/02-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 23, 2011. *1241 Christine E. Kenney, Richard L. Hathaway, Office of United States Attorney, *1242 T

BERZON, Circuit Judge: ORDER The opinion filed February 20, 2014, and published at 743 F.3d 666, is withdrawn. The superseding opinion shall be filed concurrently with this order. Further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc shall be allowed in the above-captioned matter. See G.O. 5.3(a).

*670 OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: The government appeals the dismissal of Xóchitl Garcia-Santana’s indictment for unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court determined that Garcia’s prior removal order was constitutionally inadequate because Garcia was d

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from criminal convictions following one of the lengthiest and costliest trials in this nation’s history. The trial lasted over 16 months, produced over 30,000 pages of transcripts, and involved over 250 witnesses and thousands of exhibits presenting evidence involving over 2,000 narcotics transactions spanning an 11-year period. Of the 24 defendants charged in the 44-count supersed

MANION, Circuit Judge. Crisanto Leyva, an illegal alien, appeals from the Attorney General’s final judgment to deny his application for cancellation of removal. Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss. I. By his own admission, Leyva is an illegal alien who crossed the border between the United States and Mexico in

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Jose Martinez-Maldonado, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of removal as well as the denial of his subsequent motion to reopen and reconsider. Because we lack jurisdiction of this appeal, we dismiss. I. Background

10 F.3d 1374 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 638 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Edward Lee BAKER, aka "Eddie", Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dwain Allen BAKER, aka "Butch", Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Richard Edward RUPLEY, Sr., aka "Dick", Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appelle

SPEARS, District Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment of civil contempt entered by the District Court for the Southern District of New York. Although granted use immunity, the appellant refused to answer a question directed to him by a federal grand jury, contending that he was not adequately protected by the immunity order. </

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Louis Morales was convicted of criminal contempt, 18 U.S.C. § 401(3), after a jury trial before Judge Charles E. Stewart in the Southern District of New York and was sentenced to six months in prison. Specifically, Morales refused to obey court orders directing him to answer questions before a gra

PER CURIAM: Both of the following dispositions command support of a majority of the court. For the reasons assigned in these alternate resolutions, the decision of the district court on the motion to suppress is reversed and the matter is remanded. PART I POLITZ, Circuit Judge: