Cases

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Appellants Alfonso Labráda Gurolla (“Labrada”), Jose Reyes Ortega-Gonzalez (“Ortega”), and Manuel Barraza Leon (“Barraza”) are three Mexican bankers who were arrested in the largest money laundering sting in United States history: Operation Checkmark. Appellants were tried and convicted of money laundering and related offenses and sentenced, respectivel

697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue

MEMORANDUM * *623Silverio Ortega-Amaro, a federal prisoner, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months was imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Petitioner contends that his trial counsel was ineffective

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Remaining Claims, filed February 10, 2015 (Doc. 144) (“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on May 21, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Plaintiffs who suffer no economic injury can establish standing; ‘ (it) whether th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Supplement and/or Complete the Administrative Record, and for Limited Discovery, filed November 25, 2013 (Doe. 106) (“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 7, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Plaintiffs have shown that Defendant United States Forest Service acte

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration, filed February 7, 2013 (Doc. 53)(“Motion to Reconsider”). The Court held a hearing on July 26, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court should reconsider the portion of its earlier Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed J

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dis-*1020misa Count 1 for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, filed February 18, 2013 (Doc. 55)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on July 26, 2013. The primary issue

Case: 23-50461 Document: 105-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50461 ____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed May 23, 2012 (Doc. 17). The Court held a hearing on November 9, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should extend a cause of action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, <

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1522 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr- 00387-AB-1 v. STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4603 Doc: 62 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 46 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4185 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOSE DOMINGO ORDONEZ-ZOMETA, a/k/a Felon, Defendant – Appella

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4185 Doc: 79 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 46 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4185 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOSE DOMINGO ORDONEZ-ZOMETA, a/k/a Felon, Defendant – Appella

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4504 Doc: 62 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 46 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4185 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOSE DOMINGO ORDONEZ-ZOMETA, a/k/a Felon, Defendant – Appella

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10072 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:19-cr-00012-1 MICHAEL LOUIS MCCARRON, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam Frances Tydingco-Gatewood, Chief

William J. Martinez, United States District Judge The Government charges Defendant Perry Wayne Suggs, Jr. ("Suggs"), with being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (ECF No. 24.) Currently before the Court is Suggs's Motion to Suppress, arguing that evidence agains

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-2562 ____________ JACKSON NJAI NDUNGU, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ____________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immig

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10042 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:20-cr-00029- v. FMTG-1 CHRISTOPHER DE LEON GUERRERO, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court