Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “United States v. Lausane”
People v. Perezpublic domain
People v Perez (2020 NY Slip Op 02684) People v Perez 2020 NY Slip Op 02684 Decided on May 7, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
*58ORDER OWEN, District Judge: Plaintiffs Malka Reizy Moskowitz, Sarah Feuerwerger, Berl Frankl, Moshe Eckstein, Yisruel Goldstein, Israel Fried, Joseph Mos-kowitz, and Victor Frankl (“Plaintiff’ or “Policyholders”) bring this action against Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, La Suisse, Societe D’Assurances sur la Vie, now known by merger as Schwe
City of St. Charles v. Stookeypublic domain
SANBORN, Circuit Judge. In this case the plaintiff below, Charles A. Stookey, recovered a judgment of $10,695.82, the unpaid balance of the agreed price of the construction of a system of waterworks, which consisted of three settling basins, boilers, pumps, power house, pipes, distribution mains and hydrants, for the city of St. Charles The contract price of the works was.about $84,000, and the city had paid the contractor about