Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Larson”
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Erik K. LARSON Steelworker First Class (E-6
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-9007 EDWARD T. STEWART, JR., Debtor. _____________________ SHEILA DEWITT and JOSEPH DEWITT, Plaintiffs/Creditors, Appellees, v. EDWARD T. STEWART, JR., Defendant/Debtor, Appellant. APPEAL F
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1924, 18-1985 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. BRYAN LARSON, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Timothy S. Hillman, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
José A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge: *607 The question in this case is whether the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (William M. Skretny, Judge ) properly denied Defendant-Appellant's motion for attorney's fees and other litigation expenses pu
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
FINDING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR FRANKS HEARING AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION On June 12, 2015 a search warrant was executed at 11 Manchaug Street, in Douglas, Massachusetts. Digital media seized during the search of that residence contained child pornography. The defendant, Bryan Larson, is charged with the possession of
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
807 F.Supp.2d 142 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Carl A. LARSON, et al., Defendants. No. 07-CR-304S. United States District Court, W.D. New York. August 10, 2011. *147 Thomas J. Eoannou, Buffalo, NY, for Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge. This criminal prosecution involves a man who, on February 4, 2011, allegedly brandished a firearm in Charlottesville, Virginia. The government prosecutes the defendant, Lyndon B. Larson (“Larson” or “defendant”), under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), charging that Larson knowingly possessed the firearm, a Smith and Wesson .38 Special revolver, while being sub
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
627 F.3d 1198 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Andrew LARSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-4172. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 20, 2010. *1202 Randall Gaither, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant. Vernon Stejskal, Special Assistant United States Attorney (Carlie
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
*168MEMORANDUM ** Joshua Larson (“Larson”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his conviction for receipt of child pornography without prejudice, contending that the district court should have instead dismissed his conviction with prejudice. He also challenges his conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 22
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
*168MEMORANDUM ** Joshua Larson (“Larson”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his conviction for receipt of child pornography without prejudice, contending that the district court should have instead dismissed his conviction with prejudice. He also challenges his conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 22
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
Judge RYAN delivered the opinion of the Court. A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification each of attempted carnal knowledge and attempted indecent acts with a minor, violations of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 88Ó (2000); one specification of violating a lawful general regulation, a violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
558 F.Supp.2d 1103 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joshua LARSON, Defendant. No. CR 07-07-BU-DWM. United States District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division. June 5, 2008. *1104 Marcia Hurd, U.S. Attorneys Office, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff. Michael Donahoe, Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, MT, for Defen
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-30076 v. D.C. No. PATRICIA ANN LARSON, CR-04-00110-SEH Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-30077 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-30076 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-04-00110-SEH PATRICIA ANN LARSON, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. Filed December 29, 2006
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
*1113HAWKINS, Circuit Judge, with whom PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting: A conceded street user of drugs is made into a distributor through the testimony of two witnesses, both facing mandatory prison terms. There is nothing particularly new about former colleagues “singing for their supper” — the problem here is th
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-30076 v. D.C. No. PATRICIA ANN LARSON, CR-04-00110-SEH Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-30077 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT MATHEWS, Judge: The appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of one specification each of attempted carnal knowledge and attempted indecent acts with a minor, both in violation of Article 80, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 880; one specification of violating a lawful general regulation, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892; and one specification each of communicating indecent l
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Robert C. Larson appeals his convictions of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, possession with intent to distribute over 50 grams of methamphetamine to a person under 21 years of age, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 849, and possession of firearms by an unlawful user of a controlled substance, in violation
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Randy Ray Larson appeals his 46-month sentence imposed under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines after Larson pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person. Larson contends the district court erred in relying solely on the Presentence Report (PSR) to increase his base sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (prior “crime of violence”) for a 198
United States v. Larsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** John Larson appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for two counts of securities fraud, and two counts of mail fraud, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 783(b), and 78ff, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5, and 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Larson has filed a brief stating there are no