Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 24-417-1 (CKK) MALONE LAM, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 28, 2025) Defendant Malone Lam is scheduled for trial on October 6, 2025. Min. Order (Mar. 7, 2025). At the last status he

AMENDED FINDING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS HILLMAN, District Judge. Introduction The Defendants are charged with running an illegal marijuana' cultivation and sales operation. The evidence against them includes the fruits of warranted searches of eight residences and 15 motor vehicles. Seven of the defendants have moved to suppress from.the introduction

MEMORANDUM * Dennis Morks Lam (“Lam”) appeals his conviction and sentence for selling methamphetamine. We weigh five factors in determining whether a defendant was predisposed to commit the charged crime in response to an entrapment defense: “(1) the character and reputation of the defendant; (2) whether the government made the initial suggestion of criminal activity; (3) whether the defendant engaged in t

MEMORANDUM * Dennis Morks Lam (“Lam”) appeals his conviction and sentence for selling methamphetamine. We weigh five factors in determining whether a defendant was predisposed to commit the charged crime in response to an entrapment defense: “(1) the character and reputation of the defendant; (2) whether the government made the initial suggestion of criminal activity; (3) whether the defendant engaged in t

MEMORANDUM ** Federal prisoner Tanh Huu Lam appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from the order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Lam’s motion seeks relief from an alleged defect in the federal habeas proceedings. His motion thus should have been treated as a motion pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b

MEMORANDUM * Lam Thanh Pham (“Pham”) appeals the 78-month sentence and $1 million restitution order imposed on him after he pled guilty to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and My Thi Tran (“Tran”) appeals her 42-month sentence imposed after she pled guilty to one count of the same offense. In a published opinion filed concurrently with this memorandum disposition, we vacate Pham’s s

MEMORANDUM** Federal prisoner Tanh Huu Lam appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence for arson in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). We have *893jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2253, 2255. We review a district court’s dismissal of a § 2255 motion de novo, see United Sta

LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION The plaintiff was camping with his family at an Army Corps of Engineers campsite when a tree collapsed on their tent and injured him.1 He sued the United States for negligent tree maintenance, and the government moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) on the ground that the

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHONG LAM, No. 19-16243 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-00936-LB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Cal

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. WALD, Circuit Judge: In the first appeal of Lam Kwong-Wah (“Lam”), we affirmed his conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846, but vacated his sentence because of error in calculating the proper offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Uni

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

FLOYD, Circuit Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part, and dissenting from the judgment: On no fewer than eight occasions during its closing and rebuttal arguments, the *206government misstated the legal standard governing the key issue disputed by the parties at trial — whether the genuine and allegedly counterf

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $6,190.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY; $67,690.80 IN U.S. CURRENCY; No. 08-35221 $18,336.59 IN U.S. CURRENCY; $26,478 IN U.S. CURRENCY;  D.C. No. 04-CV-00245-MA $20,000 IN U.S. CURRENCY; $6,255 IN U.S. CURRENCY,

493 F.2d 1399 U. S.v.Lam 74-1042 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 3/28/74 1 S.D.N.Y. AFFIRMED

472 F.2d 1404 U. S.v.Lam 73-1309 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit Feb. 27, 1973 1 S.D.N.Y.

364 B.R. 379 (2007) In re Richard Conrad LAM, Debtor. Carol A. Lam, Plaintiff, v. Richard Conrad Lam, Defendant. Barry L. Siders, v. Richard Conrad Lam, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-44314 TT, Adversary Nos. 05-4455 AT, 05-04447 AT. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California. March 7, 2007. *380

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. WALD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Lam Kwong-Wah was convicted after a trial by jury of one count of conspiracy to distribute heroin and to possess heroin with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846, and of one count of attempted distribution of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C

*331 PER CURIAM: The appellant Lam Muk Chiu was tried before a jury and convicted of conspiracy to import heroin 1 and on six counts of importation of heroin into the United States. 2 He