Cases

EBEL, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the district court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee Zachary Krueger’s motion to suppress evidence seized in Oklahoma pursuant to a warrant that was issued by a United States magistrate judge in Kansas. In granting Krueger’s motion, the district court concluded that suppression was necessary

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to suppress. (Doc. 11). The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. (Doc. 13). The court held an evidentiary hearing on February 6, 2013. I. Facts In May 2013, Rick Moore, a special agent with Homeland Security (HSI), received a

ORDER Amy Jo Krueger pleaded guilty to misuse of a Social Security number. See 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(8). She served 18 months’ imprisonment and then began a 3-year term of supervised release. After she violated the terms of her release, the government petitioned to have her release revoked. At her revocation hearing, Krueger stipulated to four violations— opening a checking account without her probation officer’s permission, vi

ORDER Amy Jo Krueger pleaded guilty to misuse of a Social Security number. See 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(8). She served 18 months’ imprisonment and then began a 3-year term of supervised release. After she violated the terms of her release, the government petitioned to have her release revoked. At her revocation hearing, Krueger stipulated to four violations— opening a checking account without her probation officer’s permission, vi

323 F.Supp.2d 907 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David H. KRUEGER, Defendant. No. 03-CR-245. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. June 24, 2004. *908 Lisa T. Warwick, Kelly B. Watzka, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Michael J. Fitzgerald, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-2539 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAUL A. KRUEGER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-4328 Doc: 54 Filed: 07/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-4328 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ANDREW DAVID KRUEGER, Defendant – Appellant

Susan L. Carney, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-appellant Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Edward R. Korman, Judge ) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Dhinsa claims that he is entitled to bring a petition under 28 U.S.C. §

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Hamilton, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant Joshua E. Shepherd was pulled over by the police in Kentucky. The officers found marijuana and a gun in his car. He pleaded guilty in federal court to one count of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, and two counts for criminal forfeiture. At sentencing, the district judge in Kentucky applied an Armed Career Criminal A

*1603Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

ORDER Michael M. Mihm, United States District Judge This matter is now before the Court on pro se Petitioner Elvert Berry’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the petition. This matter is now terminated. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 29,2003, a jury found Petitioner guil

MEMORANDUM & ORDER KORMAN, Judge.: Petitioner, Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa, was convicted of numerous offenses following a jury trial that involved approximately 100 witnesses and lasted nearly four months. United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 642 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897, 122 S.Ct. 219, 151 L.Ed.2d 156 (2001). The evidence presented at trial, as described by the Second Circuit

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

ORDER We grant Michael Gamboa’s petition for rehearing to the extent that we vacate our order of February 25, 2016, and replace it with this order. No judge in active service has called for a vote on Gamboa’s request for rehearing en banc; that request is denied. In 2002 Gamboa was convicted after a jury trial in the District of North Dakota of seven offenses involving firearms, narcotics possession, and conspiracy

DECISION ON THE MERITS ROBSON, Chief Judge. The defendant Lenhard Michael Krueger is charged with refusing to submit to induction into the armed services, in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. After a trial on the merits, this court finds the defendant not guilty as charged in the indictment. On July 18, 1969, the defendant was classified 1-A by Indiana Local Board No. 71. On October 10