Cases

DECISION AND ORDER 'Sharon L. Gleason, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Veronica Koelzer filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“disability insurance”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”),1 alleging disability beginning November 1, 2013.2 Ms. Koelzer has exhausted her

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

526 F.3d 306 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rickey Donnel SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-1375. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 28, 2008. Decided and Filed: May 22, 2008. *307 ARGUED: David A. Koelzer, Federal Defender's Office, Flint, Michigan, for Appella

522 F.3d 710 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Patrick ROSE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-1642. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 31, 2008. Decided and Filed: March 26, 2008[*]. *712 ARGUED: David A. Koelzer, Federal Defender's Office, Flint, M

457 F.Supp.2d 802 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rickey Donnel SMITH, Defendant. Criminal No. 05-50062. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 18, 2006. *803 David A. Koelzer, Federal Defender, Federal Defender Office, Flint, MI, for Defendant. Richmond M. Riggs, U.S. Attorn

328 F.Supp.2d 682 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth Bernard LOCKETT, Defendant. No. CR. 03-50041. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 16, 2004. *683 David A. Koelzer, Federal Defender Office, Federal Defender, Federal Defender Office (Flint), Flint, MI, for Kenneth Bernard Loc

OPINION SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Bernard Whitting-ton was convicted of conspiracy to distribute five grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(iii). He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion in limine to exclude evidence that Whittington was found in possession of large amounts of c

291 F.Supp.2d 557 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dena Lynne BOVEE, and Tim Elliott Bovee, Defendants. No. CRIM. 02-50023. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 13, 2003. *558 David A. Koelzer, Federal Defender, Federal Defender Office, Flint, MI, for Dena Lunne Bovee.

277 F.Supp.2d 756 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Anthony Lamar GREEN, Defendant. No. CRIM. 03-50003. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 12, 2003. *757 David A. Koelzer, Federal Defender, Federal Defender Office, Flint, for Anthony Lamar Green (1), defendant. Nancy A. Abra

PER CURIAM. Defendant-Appellant Thomas Leach (“Leach”) was convicted under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and (g)(3) for the possession of firearms by a felon and a user of controlled substances. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the firearms, which were found in his home by the use of an improperly-issued search warrant. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. This court reviews fo

SARGUS, District Judge. Shawn Derrick Robbs appeals his conviction on two counts of distribution of five grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Robbs raises three assignments of error. First, he claims that the district court should have granted his motion for mistrial because of certain comments the court and prosecutor made in front of the jury; second, Robbs claims that the district court sh

233 F.Supp.2d 864 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dena Lynne BOVEE, and Tim Elliott Bovee, Defendants. No. CRIM.02-50023. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 22, 2002. *865 David A. Koelzer, Federal Defender, Federal Defender Office, Flint, MI, James L. Witzel, Witz, Fawley, Eas

VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge (concurring). I agree with the opinion of Judge Green and the result it reaches, but, in view of the preparation of this pro se complaint by a layman-prisoner,1 the second full sentence on page 2 of the majority opinion, and the complaint’s reliance on 18 U.S.C. § 241,2 I believ

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0017p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appe

DOWD, District Judge. I. Introduction The defendant-appellant prosecutes an appeal from his conviction on one count of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 based on his failure to report as income the sum of $90,000.00 he received as a bribe in his capacity as the President of the Board of Education of the Detroit Public Schools. Prior to ente

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER [Post-trial Motions] BRIEANT, Chief Judge. Following a jury verdict which convicted him on 16 counts of a 20 count Indictment, finding him not guilty on four of the counts, Alfred Covino moves for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29(c), F.R.Crim.P., or alternatively for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33, F.R.Crim.P. The motion for a new trial need not detain us, sin

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Chief Judge. In this admiralty action, plaintiff Rainbow Navigation, Inc., the carrier, seeks to recover from defendant United States, the shipper, additional compensation for twenty-two days that Rainbow’s vessel was anchored off the coast of Iceland unable to discharge the government’s cargo because of a strike. Plaintiff

742 F.Supp. 171 (1990) RAINBOW NAVIGATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 86-4343. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. July 13, 1990. *172 *173 *174 George Koelzer, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Edison, N.

SILER, Circuit Judge. The United States (“the government”) appeals the district court’s pre-trial dismissal of Count 2 of the second superseding indictment which charged Walid Khalife, Fred Ab-denour, and Goldcorp, Inc.- (collectively, “the defendants”) with conspiring to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The district court held that the defendants could

534 F.Supp. 753 (1982) UNITED STATES of America v. Michael O. MYERS, Angelo J. Errichetti, Louis C. Johanson, and Howard L. Criden, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America v. Harrison A. WILLIAMS, Jr. and Alexander Feinberg, Defendants. Nos. CR 80-00249, CR 80-00575. United States District Court, E. D. New York. March 24, 1982.