Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ.”
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: *230 President Donald J. Trump appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Buchwald, J. ) concluding that he engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination by utilizing Twi
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, "block" a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States. The answer to both questions is no. Our analysis proceeds as
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 12, 2021 Decided August 27, 2021 No. 20-5045 KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, APPELLEE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS, APPELLANT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from t
Knight First Amendment Institute v. Donald J. Trumppublic domain
18-1691-cv Knight First Amendment Institute, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al. 18‐1691‐cv Knight First Amendment Institute, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square,
Knight v. USCISpublic domain
20-3837 Knight v. USCIS et al. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2021 No. 20-3837 KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STA
EEOC v. Village at Hamilton Pointe LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2806 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE AT HAMILTON POINTE LLC, d/b/a Hamilton Pointe Health and Rehabilitation Center; d/b/a Hamilton Pointe Assisted Living Center; d/b/a The Cottages at Hamilton Pointe and TENDER LOV
Bynum v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CEMONE ANTENETTE BYNUM Plaintiff, No. 16-cv-1904 (EGS) v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Cemone Antenette Bynum (“Ms. Bynum”), an African- American woman and employee of the District of Columbia’s Department of Behavioral Health (“DBH”), brings this
Ricky Knight v. Leslie Thompsonpublic domain
SCHLESINGER, District Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) are male inmates in the custody of the Alabama Department of Corrections (“ADOC”). They wish to wear their hair unshorn in accordance with the dictates of their Native American religion, but an ADOC policy forbids them from doing so. Plaintiffs brought this suit against the ADOC and several other defen
Ricky Knight v. Leslie Thompsonpublic domain
SCHLESINGER, District Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) are male inmates in the custody of the Alabama Department of Corrections (“ADOC”). They wish to wear their hair unshorn in accordance with the dictates of their Native American religion, but an ADOC policy forbids them from doing so. Plaintiffs brought this suit against the ADOC and several other def
John Doe v. Columbia Universitypublic domain
LEVAL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff, a Columbia University student who is identified by the pseudonym John Doe, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Furman, /.), dismissing his amended complaint (“the Complaint”) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) “for failure to state a claim on
Knight v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. Wayne B. Knight (“Knight”) and 2021 Love Point, LLC (“Love Point”) brought this suit against Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“Defendant”) alleging breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of a fiduciary duty, and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Knight and Love Point later amended their complaint to add a new Plaintif
Ninestar Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE NINESTAR CORPORATION, ZHUHAI NINESTAR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI PANTUM ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ZHUHAI APEX MICROELECTRONICS CO., LTD., GEEHY SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., ZHUHAI G&G DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI SEINE PRINTING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and ZHUHAI NINESTAR MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, v.
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Acting pursuant to a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, § 1504, Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, 2220 (2010), the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated a Rule requiring certain companies to disclose payments made to foreign governments in con
In re: United States of Americapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att
In re: United States of Americapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att
Savage v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLIE SAVAGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-2477 (JEB) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In the last poem of his “Four Quartets,” T.S. Eliot wrote: We shall not cease from explorat
Richardson v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA T. CARLTON RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 09-01856 (HHK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION T. Carlton Richardson’s license to practice law has been suspended as a result
First NBC Bank v. Murex, LLCpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge This decision resolves a motion to disqualify counsel. Defendant Murex, LLC (“Murex”) moves to disqualify the law firm Holland & Knight LLP (“H & K”), which, on behalf, of plaintiff First NBC Bank (“FNBC”) brought this 13-count lawsuit, claiming that Murex sold FNBC bogus receivables, and accusing Murex of, inter ali
Connell v. United States Central Intelligence Agencypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES G. CONNELL, III, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-627 (CRC) UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2006, the Central Intelligence Agency transferred a number of “high-value” detainees to a de
Richardson v. District of Columbiapublic domain
711 F.Supp.2d 115 (2010) T. Carlton RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-01856 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 14, 2010. *117 T. Carlton Richardson, Washington, DC, pro se. Thomas Louis Koger, Office of the Attorney General, Noah Anthony Clem