⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Kiser”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 767 F.2d 914
767 F.2d 914 U.S.v.Kiser 84-5213 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 6/24/85 1 W.D.N.C. AFFIRMED
Johnson v. Kiserpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 2802; 207 L. Ed. 2d 141
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Dotson v. Kiserpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 539; 193 L. Ed. 2d 433
*540Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
State v. Kiserpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 952
[Cite as State v. Kiser, 2026-Ohio-952.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : C.A. No. 30647 Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 202
Supreme Court of the United States · 1992-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 503 U.S. 983
C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2004-05-20 · Published · cited 0× · 344 B.R. 432; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2459
MEMORANDUM DECISION WILLIAM F. STONE JR., Bankruptcy Judge. Jackson and Laura Kiser acquired by separate deeds two lots, apparently adjoining, in Russell County, Virginia. One of these lots was approximately .56 acre and the other was approximately .75 acre. The Kisers proceeded to build a house on the .75 acre lot and purchased materials for such purpose from Builders’ Supermarket. The credit agr
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2003-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 344 B.R. 423; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 2212; 2003 WL 24845552
344 B.R. 423 (2003) Jackson Vaughan KISER, Laura Christine Kiser, Debtors. Jackson Vaughan Kiser, et ux., v. Russell County, Virginia, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 7-03-00001-WSA-7, Adversary No. 7-03-00076. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. December 2, 2003. *424 John M. Lamie, Abingdon,
Supreme Court of the United States · 1992-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 503 U.S. 983; 112 S. Ct. 1666
C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995-12-15 · Published · cited 0× · 74 F.3d 1228; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38616; 1995 WL 769144
74 F.3d 1228 U.S.v.Lamare R. Kiser a/k/a Lamour Kiser NO. 95-7246 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Dec 15, 1995 Appeal From: D.Del., No. 94-cr-00067-2, Schwartz, J. 1 AFFIRMED.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-06-27 · Published · cited 15× · 219 N.E.3d 465; 2023 Ohio 2136
[Cite as Kiser v. United Dairy Farmers, 2023-Ohio-2136.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Courtney Kiser, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 22AP-539 (C.P.C. No. 21CV-0753) v. :
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991-10-16 · Published · cited 69× · 948 F.2d 418; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24714; 1991 WL 206285
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Stanley Kiser appeals from his conviction of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848(b) (1988); conspiring to knowingly and intentionally distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (1988); and nine counts of knowingly and intentionally possessing various amounts of cocaine with the intent
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 95 F. App'x 495
PER CURIAM. Wilma Fay Kiser seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and orders affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of her survivor’s claim for black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000) and denying reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of t
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 520 U.S. 1190; 117 S. Ct. 1478
App. Ct. Conn. Cer-tiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 520 U.S. 1190
App. Ct. Conn. Cer-tiorari denied.
State v. Kiserpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-06-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ohio 2012
[Cite as State v. Kiser, 2022-Ohio-2012.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee
Gordon v. Kiserpublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 821 S.E.2d 531
OPINION BY SENIOR JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY In this appeal we consider whether the circuit court erred in denying a motion for nonsuit, prospectively denying an inmate in forma pauperis status pursuant to Code § 8.01-692, and imposing a pre-service review with possible summary dismissal on the inmate's future filings. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-12-27 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6524 GARY WALL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN JEFFREY KISER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:17-cv-00066-EKD-
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-01-23 · Published · cited 56× · 57 F.4th 1085
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHRIS LANGER, No. 21-55183 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-00195- BEN-AHG MILAN KISER, in individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Milan and Diana Kiser Revocable OPINION Trust dated August 19, 2003; DIANA
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983-09-26 · Published · cited 75× · 716 F.2d 1268; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16573
FARRIS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes that the limited right of disclosure announced in Roviaro and McCray is consistent with the challenge to the warrant affidavit permitted under Franks. I disagree. Under Franks, Kiser is entitled to a hearing to challenge the validity of the warrant affidavit only upon a sub
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-12-27 · Published · cited 12× · 21 F.4th 266
USCA4 Appeal: 19-6524 Doc: 69 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 32 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6524 GARY WALL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN JEFFREY KISER, Respondent - Appellee.