Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Kia”
United States v. Kiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Eugene Kia entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession of a prohibited and unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). Mr. Kia appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress the weapons and ammunition seized during the execution of a search warrant. Mr. Kia argues that the warrant did not meet the probable cause and particularity requirements of the Fourth Ame
Denizac v. KIA Motors Corp.public domain
GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge This case arises out of a one-vehicle accident in which the driver sustained significant head trauma and other injuries. Following the accident, Luis John Hernadez Denizac, Ly Ann Hernandez Lopez, Luis Hernandez, and Nilsa Denizac (collectively "Plaintiffs") sued Kia Motors Corporation ("Kia" or "Defendant") in federal court asserting diversity jurisdiction and theories of product defec
Davis v. Kia Motors Am., Inc.public domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Hughes v. Kia Motors Corp.public domain
Opinion *1424Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Davis v. Kia Motors Am., Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
MARTIN, Circuit Judge: Before she was fired in 2011, Andrea Gogel was the manager of the Team Relations Department of Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc., a subsidiary of the Korean Kia Motors Corporation. During her time at Kia, Ms. Gogel heard many complaints about how women and Americans were treated at the Korean-owned company. She experienced similar treatment herself and,
Davis v. Kia Motors of Americapublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Davis v. Kia Motors America, Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 731.
Davis v. Kia Motors America, Inc.public domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Davis v. Kia Motors America, Inc.public domain
Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 196, 178 L. Ed. 2d 118, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6998.
Davis v. Kia Motors America, Inc.public domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Davis v. Kia Motors America, Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 408.
Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Samuel-Bassettpublic domain
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.public domain
Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. I agree with the majority’s rationale as it concerns the attorney-fee matters but dissent relative to the class treatment as it was administered by the trial court. I. Preface Initially, the majority’s overarching approach to this appeal appears to suggest liberality in favor of class certification. I have no objection, to the degree that this doe
Kia P. v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Qualitee Moshi v. Kia Motors Am., Inc.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0256p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 24-3609 ┐ QUALITEE MOSHI, Administrator of the Estate on │ behalf of Matthew P. Moshi,
Angela Flowers v. Kia Motors Financepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2270 ANGELA FLOWERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KIA MOTORS FINANCE, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
United States v. Slattenpublic domain
III. DISCUSSION Mr. Slatten seeks to exclude all evidence "relating to alleged shooting and victims in Nisur Square after the shooting of the white Kia." 14-cr-107, ECF No. 716 at 1. He does not articulate particular pieces of evidence within that category of evidence, but rather argues that none of it is relevant to the single charge against him. He further contends that even if the evidence has some probative value, that
United States v. Hanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Defendant Michael Hah allegedly promised investors that his company Envión would usher in .a black gold rush-by turning plastic back into oil. According to the Government, although that concept never materialized, it did not stop Han from stringing alon
United States v. Vernel Williamspublic domain
RESTREPO, Circuit Judge. Vernel Aubrey Williams appeals his judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed by the District Court, contending that his rights under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 - 3174, were violated. Williams argues