Cases

Case: 20-20030 Document: 00515852054 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 19, 2023 Decided December 22, 2023 No. 22-3072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. KHAN MOHAMMED, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:06-cr-00357-1)

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 25, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal Case No. 16–96 (RBW) ) SHARAFAT ALI KHAN, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before A.C. RUGH, T.H. CAMPBELL, T.P. BELSKY Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAHEDI H. KH AN CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. M ARINE CORPS NMCCA 201600195 SPECIAL COUR

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600177 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. KEIRON S. DARBY Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

PILLARD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Khan Mohammed was extradited from Afghanistan to the United States and convicted, following a 2008 jury trial, of international drug trafficking and narcoterrorism, i.e., using drug proceeds to fund terrorists or terrorism. This case comes to us on direct appeal a second time, after this court affirmed Mohammed’s sentence and

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. CIR. R. 34(j). The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below,

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Masoud Ahmad Khan seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

PUBLIC COPY – SEALED INFORMATION DELETED United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 17, 2011 Decided September 4, 2012 No. 09-3001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. KHAN MOHAMMED, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 09-3001 September Term, 2012 1:06-cr-00357-CKK-1 Filed On: September 21, 2012 United States of America, Appellee v. Khan Mohammed,

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Farook Khan appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.) convicting him of a single count of Aggravated Illegal Reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1), following his guilty *706plea. Defendant claims: (1) that the Government improperly coerced him to enter a plea

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 17, 2011 Decided September 4, 2012 Reissued September 21, 2012 No. 09-3001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. KHAN MOHAMMED, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court

(2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Shaheed KHAN, Defendant. No. 06-cr-255 (DLI). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 19, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DORA L. IRIZARRY, District Judge. Before this court is a motion by the government requesting an order prohibiting the defendants' attorneys from making statements to the pres

591 F.Supp.2d 166 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Shaheed KHAN, Defendant. No. 06-cr-255 (DLI). United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 13, 2008. *167 Berit Winge Berger, James Patrick Loonam, Paige Michaela Petersen, Andrew Edward Goldsmith, Shannon Cassandra Jones, United States Attorneys Office, Eastern District o

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Shaheed Khan appeals, under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 9(a), from a January 16, 2007 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, J.) denying his application for bail and directing that he be detained pending trial. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case and with the arguments on app

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Farook Khan appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.) convicting him of a single count of Aggravated Illegal Reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1), following his guilty *706plea. Defendant claims: (1) that the Government improperly coerced him to enter a plea

508 F.3d 413 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dianne KHAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-4090. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 12, 2007. Decided November 1, 2007. *414 *415 Jonathan H. Koenig (argued), Office of the United

591 F.Supp.2d 202 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Shaheed KHAN, Defendant. No. 06-cr-255 (DLI). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 15, 2008. *204 James Patrick Loonam, Andrew Edward Goldsmith, Shannon Cassandra Jones, United States Attorneys Office, Brooklyn, NY, for United States of America. Diarmui

MEMORANDUM * Amanullah Khan appeals his conviction and 188-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea. We will not reverse Khan’s conviction based on Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 errors. The district judge committed two errors under Rule 11, but Khan has not met his burden of showing that but for the errors, he would not have entered the guilty plea. See United States v