Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Kernaghan”
Kernaghan v. BCI Communications, Inc.public domain
OPINION SLOMSKY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Clearwire Corporation (Doc. No. 9). This case arises out of an Independent Contractor Agreement (the “Agreement”) between Plaintiffs and another defendant, BCI Communications, Inc. (“BCI”). Defendant BCI was hired by Defendant Clearwire Corporation (“Clear-wire”) to serve
United States v. Wardpublic domain
808 F.Supp. 803 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Leon Cletus "Bruno" WARD, et al. No. CR192-049. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Augusta Division. September 15, 1992. *804 Thomas W. Tucker, Augusta, GA, for Leon Cletus Ward. Richard A. Wright, and Richard Allen, for William E. Baxter. Bernard Dunstan,
Kernaghan v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
791 F.2d 918 Kernaghanv.City of Philadelphia 85-1175 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 5/6/86 E.D.Pa., Kelly, J. AFFIRMED
United States v. Jenkinspublic domain
633 F.3d 788 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy W. JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ira W. Gentry, Jr., aka Ira Willie Gentry, aka Donald Isaac Williams, aka Don Williams, aka Fred Koone, aka Don Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-10109, 09-10110. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
United States v. Mulherinpublic domain
ORDER BOWEN, District Judge. Rule 801(d)(2)(E), of the Federal Rules of Evidence, provides that a statement made by a coconspirator is not hearsay if it is made “during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Under the Rule, therefore, before the extrajudicial statement of a coconspirator may be admitted, the following facts must be established: “that a conspiracy existed; that the coconspirator
United States v. William Ezria Powellpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 80
United States v. Roy W. Williams and Carl v. Iveypublic domain
DYER, Circuit Judge: In this boundary dispute, Williams and Ivey appeal from the District Court’s judgment enjoining them from future trespass on lands owned by the United States and ordering them to remove all obstructions from the Government’s property. Williams and Ivey argue that the District Court erred both in denying them a jur
373 F.Supp. 235 (1974) FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 73-205. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division. March 14, 1974. H. Simmons Tate, Jr., George S. King, Jr., of Boyd, Knowlton, Tate & Finlay, Columbia, for plaintiff. Irvine F. Belser, J
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered June 18, 2003, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against defendants-respondents Oxford Venture Partners, LLC and Karim Rajani, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. . In October 2002, plaintiff commenced an action against respondents Oxford Venture Partners, L
Proctor v. First Premier Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARNITA PROCTOR, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-2162 (BAH) FIRST PREMIER CORP., et al., Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Dipple v. Odellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM YOHN, District Judge. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to expedite discovery and defendants have filed a response thereto. For the reasons set forth below, I will deny plaintiffs’ motion. I. Background This case arises out of an offer by The Gores Group, LLC (“Gores”), a private-equity firm, to acquire all the outstanding shares of common stock of The Pep B
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BANDERA MASTER FUND LP, BANDERA ) VALUE FUND LLC, BANDERA OFFSHORE ) VALUE FUND LTD., LEE-WAY ) FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., and JAMES ) R. MCBRIDE, on behalf of themselves and ) similarly situated BOARDWALK PIPELINE ) PARTNERS, LP UNITHOLDERS, ) ) Plaintiffs,
Brzozowski v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commissionpublic domain
*256MEMORANDUM Stengel, Judge. Pro se plaintiff, Frank Brzozowski, filed this employment discrimination action against his former employer, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (“PTC”), and several of its agents and employees including William K. Lieberman, A. Michael Pratt, Pasquale T. Deon, Sean Logan, Barry J. Schoch, Patricia Schlegel, Ju
King-Coleman v. Geatherspublic domain
841 So.2d 593 (2003) Sheila M. KING-COLEMAN, Appellant, v. Larry J. GEATHERS, Appellee. No. 4D02-3194. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 2, 2003. *594 Jack A. Fleischman of Fleischman & Fleischman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. R. Stephen Ottewell of Law Office of R. Stephen Ottewell,
Constitution Bank v. Olsonpublic domain
423 Pa. Superior Ct. 134 (1993) 620 A.2d 1146 CONSTITUTION BANK v. Robert P. OLSON and Edward C. Rorer & Co., Inc. and Paine Webber Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Appeal of Robert P. OLSON. CONSTITUTION BANK v. Robert P. OLSON and Edward C. Rorer & Co., Inc. and Paine Webber Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Appeal of Robert P. OLS
MEMORANDUM DALZELL, District Judge. I. Introduction We consider here a motion by St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (“St. Jude”) to dismiss Count I of the complaint filed by the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania (“Penn” or “the University”), a Count which alleges tortious interference *235with con
Lloyd's Underwriter's at London v. Ruby, Inc.public domain
801 So.2d 138 (2001) LLOYD'S UNDERWRITER'S AT LONDON, Appellant, v. RUBY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Sphere Drake Insurance, Appellees. No. 4D00-3731. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 21, 2001. Rehearing Denied December 21, 2001. Thomas J. Morgan of Thomas J. Morgan, P.A., Coconut Grove, for appellant. Todd
Crowley v. VISIONMAKER, LLCpublic domain
512 F.Supp.2d 144 (2007) Steven CROWLEY, Plaintiff, v. VISIONMAKER, LLC, Palace Entertainment Holdings, Inc., as successor in interest to VisionMaker, LLC, MidOcean Partners, LP and MidOcean Partners II, LP, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 9388(DAB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 25, 2007. *145
223 F.Supp.2d 474 (2002) INTERNET LAW LIBRARY, INC. and Hunter M.A. Carr, Plaintiffs v. SOUTHRIDGE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC; Steve Hicks; Dan Pickett; Christy Constabile; Thomson Kernaghan & Co., Ltd.; and Cootes Drive, LLC, Defendants. Cootes Drive LLC, Plaintiff v. Internet Law Library, Inc., Defendant. Bill U. Brewer, Marc Caldwell, et al. Plaintiffs v. Southridge Capital Management LLC; Stephen Hicks; Daniel Pickett
Ferrara v. Ryen Munro & Tripping Gnome Farm, LLCpublic domain
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This breach of contract action, relating to failure to pay commissions on the sale of alpacas, is currently before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 14.1 When filed, the motion was on behalf of both the individual defendant (Ryen Munro) and the corporate defendant (Tripping Gnome Farm, LLC) (sometimes