Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Kent”
United States v. Kentpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 17-cr-123-2 (RDM/GMH) ) JARVELL KENT, ) ) Defendant. ) _________
United States v. Kent Morganpublic domain
Rovner, Circuit Judge. The jury deciding Kent Morgan's fate had no trouble concluding that he had possessed the 86.5 grams of methamphetamine that he conceded he tossed over the heads of inquisitive law enforcement officers in the Peoria airport on January 7, 2016. But the jury could not come to an agreement as to whether the government proved that he possessed that methamphetamine with
United States v. Kent Morganpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2751 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENT MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the C
United States v. Kentpublic domain
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: This appeal by Thomas Jefferson Kent arises from a wire fraud conspiracy case against Kent, Sanford Gottesman, Brad Robinson, and Beno Matthews, 1 who were each convicted in connection with them participation in an “advance fee” scheme— a scheme in which supposed lending companies op
United States v. Kentpublic domain
649 F.3d 906 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay KENT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-10011. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 2, 2010. Filed February 8, 2011. Amended May 24, 2011. *908 Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, and
United States v. Kentpublic domain
633 F.3d 920 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay KENT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-10011. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 2, 2010. Filed February 8, 2011. *922 Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, and Daniel P. Blank (argued), Assistant Fe
United States v. Kentpublic domain
OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Jay Kent’s appeal of his conviction and sentence for drug distribution offenses requires us to decide two questions: First, once a defendant has stated before the district court his or her intention to enter a guilty plea, is it an abuse of that court’s discretion to accept a prosecutor’s filing of enhanced charges against the defendant? Second, does a prosecutor act with imperm
United States v. Kentpublic domain
531 F.3d 642 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tron KENT, Appellant. No. 07-2920. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 10, 2008. Filed: July 7, 2008. *646 Ted Eric Liszewski, argued, Ballwin, MO, for appellant. Keith D. Sorrell, AUSA, argued, Cape Girardeau, MO, for
United States v. Kent Platterpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT __________ No. 06-4139 __________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Kent Raymond Platter, * * Appellant.
United States v. Kentpublic domain
OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. Because we write only for the parties in this not precedential opinion, we will recite only those facts necessary to reach our decision. On February 5, 2002, appellant James Kent was indicted for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). After a two-day jury trial, Kent was convicted. The District Court sentenced Kent to 112 months’
United States v. Kent G. Berheidepublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Kent G. Berheide pled guilty to one count of making a false statement and overvaluing secu *539 rity to influence Peoples State Bank to defer action on the replevin of collateral for a loan in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014.
Kent v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 15-365 L; 18-1591 L Filed: January 17, 2025 ________________________________________ ) KENT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
United States v. Kentpublic domain
HULL, Circuit Judge: Appellant Jason Christopher Kent appeals his convictions for five separate firearms offenses and appeals his seventy-eight-month sentence. After review, we affirm. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY A jury convicted Kent of five separate firearms offenses: possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (Count
United States v. Kentpublic domain
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
United States v. Kent David Olsonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-3905 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Dist
United States v. Maurice Kentpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 22-13068 Document: 40-1 Date Filed: 02/26/2024 Page: 1 of 12 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13068 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States v. Maurice Kentpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 22-13068 Document: 40-1 Date Filed: 02/26/2024 Page: 1 of 12 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13068 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States v. Kent Olsenpublic domain
135 F.3d 767 U.S.v.Kent Olsen NO. 97-1358 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Dec 11, 1997 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.91CR00025 1 Affirmed.
United States v. Donte Kentpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3879 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Donte Kent
United States v. Kentpublic domain
5 F.3d 1500 U.S.v.Kent** NO. 92-9131 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 30, 1993 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2