Cases

715 F.Supp.2d 657 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. John H. KANG, John P. Sessions, Defendants. Criminal No. 9:05-cr-00928. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division. May 27, 2010. *659 Kevin F. McDonald, US Attorneys Office, Columbia, SC, Eric J. Klumb, United States Attorney's Office, Charl

489 F.Supp.2d 1095 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Edward KANG, Defendant. No. 3-07-70312 (BZ). United States District Court, N.D. California. June 12, 2007. Geoffrey A. Hansen, Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant. Andrew P. Caputo, Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. ORDER DENYING DEFE

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Kang Yeon Lee appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Frederic Block, Judge), entered on August 16, 2006, sentencing him on a guilty plea principally to twenty-four months’ imprisonment for one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and six months’ imprisonment for one count of willful violation of Occupational Safety and Health

MEMORANDUM ** Federal prisoner Leonard Kang appeals pro se the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, and dismiss in part. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of Kang’s motion for reconsideration. United States

993 F.2d 226 U.S.v.Kang (Joseph) NO. 92-1645 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Mar 10, 1993 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. 2 APPEAL DISMISSED.

950 F.2d 724 U.S.v.Kang (Joseph) NO. 91-1388 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. NOV 13, 1991 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. 2 VACATED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM * The United States appeals the district court’s sentence imposed on Dai Bong Kang and Hyun Ju Lee following their convictions pursuant to guilty pleas to the use of a communication device in facilitating the commission of a federal drug crime, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). After careful consideration of the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district cour

MEMORANDUM** Chao Kang Lin appeals his 108-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to smuggle and transport illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a)(l)(A)(v)(I), (B)(i), (B)(iii), (B)(iv). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Lin contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 98-3486WM _____________ United States of America, * * On Appeal from the United Appellee, * States District Court * for the Western District

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM. Lord Kang appeals the sentence imposed by the District Court 1 upon remand for resentencing. We affirm. In May 1997, defendant pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to one count of possessing cocaine base or crack with intent to distribute and one count of distributing cocain

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*380 RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge. This is a drug case in which the issues on appeal relate to the length of the sentence imposed on the defendant, Lord Kang. Kang pleaded guilty to one count of possessing cocaine base or “crack” with intent to distribute it, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.

*261 PER CURIAM. On February 1, 1999, Khung Chang Kang was charged with alien smuggling, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. On September 20, 1999, Kang waived indictment and, pursuant to a plea agreement, entered a guilty plea to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii). Before Kang was sentenced, the di

MEMORANDUM1 He Kang Lin appeals his conviction for attempted alien smuggling to a place other than a designated port, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A). On appeal, Lin argues that the district court erred in finding that venue was proper in the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands (“CNMI”).2 The identical issue was previously considered by this court in Un

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ______________ No. 97-3423WM ______________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * On Appeal from the v. * United St

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

84 F.Supp.2d 613 (2000) Kang Joo KWAN, individually and as representative of a class, and Se Jeik Park, on behalf of the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea, and The Republic of Korea, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 99-181. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 11, 2000.