Cases

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Section 3Bl.l(a) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines increases by four levels the guidelines range for a defendant who is found to be an organizer or leader of criminal activity in which there were at least five participants. (If he is found just to be a manager or supervisor, the increase is only three levels. See section 3Bl.l(b).) The defendant was a memb

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Jose Humberto Solano-Ro-sales (“Defendant” or “Solano-Rosales”) appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court following his plea to the charge of returning to the United States without authorization after removal following a felony offense, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). For the reasons set fo

TANG, Senior Circuit Judge: Defendant Eduardo Garcia-Camacho. and Defendant Jose Jesus Gutierrez-Rosales appeal the denial of their motions to suppress evidence seized after an investigatory stop by U.S. Border Patrol Agents. Defendants claim the agents did not have reasonable suspicion to stop their pickup truck and thus conducted an illegal search and seizure in violation of t

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Jose Ramon Gerezano-Rosales (“Gerezano”) appeals his non-Guidelines sentence of 108 months of imprisonment for illegal reentry. We VACATE Gerezano’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing. I Gerezano pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with illegal reentry. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) & (b). . The presentence report (“PSR”) calculated an advi

GOODWIN, Chief Judge: Adislado Rosales appeals his sentence upon his guilty plea to misprision of a felony (distribution of heroin) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4. He contends that the district court erred in not reducing his base offense level for acceptance of responsibility and in considering the total amount of heroin involved in the underlying felony in setting his base offe

650 F.Supp.2d 823 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Salvador ROSALES. No. 06 CR 896. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 1, 2009. *825 Andrew C. Porter, Meghan C. Morrissey, Nancy L. Depodesta, Ausa, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, Pretrial Services, for United States of America.

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Manuel Rosales-Avalos appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rosales-Avalos’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: *196 Jose Nino-Carreon pleaded guilty of illegal reentry after removal and was sentenced to fifty months' imprisonment. He appeals his sentence, asserting that the district court plainly erred in assessing criminal history points for three convictions occurring

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Manuel Rosales-Avalos appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rosales-Avalos’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Defendant Jose Darwin Reyes-Ochoa appeals his 41-month within-Guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. He contends, for the first time on appeal, that the district court committed reversible plain error by imposing a 16-level “crime of violence” Guidelines enhancement based on his prior Virginia convictions for sta

Case: 15-41270 Document: 00514059107 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2017 REVISED July 5, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-41270

J. Brett Busby, Justice Appellant Jesus Rosales appeals his conviction for two counts of super-aggravated sexual assault of a child. In his first two issues, appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for mistrial and his request for an Allen charge after the jury twice indicated it was deadlocked. In his third issue, appellant argues the trial court erred in designating

NANCY F. ATLAS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a trademark dispute concerning the names and logo used by two restaurant chains. Defendants El Pollo Regio IP, LLC and Jorge Bazaldua1 ("Bazaldua" and, with El Pollo Regio IP, LLC, "Defendants") filed a "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, and Memorandum of Law in Support" ("Motion") [Doc. # 18]. Plaintiffs Isaias Rosales, ind

Opinion issued February 11, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Ramos-Rosales appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ramos-Rosales has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ramo

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-4539 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant - Appellant. No. 15-4569 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL,

PER CURIAM.* Jose Alfredo Saucedo-Rosales appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Saucedo contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offe

PER CURIAM.* Jose Luis Camacho-Rosales appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Camacho-Rosales complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Camacho-Ro

ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, United States District Judge Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by the United States of America, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and FBI Agent John Doe on September 24, 2014 (D.E. 34) and the opposition filed by plaintiff José Ruiz-Rivera on November 3, 2014 (D.E. 37).1 At the outset, we must clarify (1) that the FBI

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Rosales Esquivel (Rosales) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rosales has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,