Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. John Badger Thorpe”
OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Roy Thompson acts as a trustee for a trust whose investment accounts were formerly managed by defendant Leonel Federico. Plaintiff alleges the trust suffered about $1 million in losses under Federico’s watch. In an attempt to recover those losses, plaintiff brings negligence and fraud claims against Federico and his employer, Citigroup Global Markets, f/
269 B.R. 139 (2001) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Syed RAHMAN, Plaintiff, v. ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., Defendants. In re Equimed, Inc., Debtor. Merrill Cohen, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Douglas Colkitt, M.D., et al., Defendants. In re Nixon Equipment Corporation, et al., Debtors. In re Equimed, Inc., Debtor. Equimed, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Steadfast Insurance Company and Reliance Insurance Company
ORDER DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge. This action was brought in an Oklahoma State Court to adjudicate a disputed title to real property in which the United States claims an interest. The United States thereafter removed the action to this Court and then moved to dismiss the same on the basis that this action against the United States, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, may only be brought in the District Courts
Ulmet v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION HORN, Judge. This military pay case, originally assigned to The Honorable Philip R. Miller, is before this court as a result of a reversal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Ulmet v. United States, 822 F.2d 1079 (Fed.Cir.1987), of an opinion by Judge Miller, Ulmet v. United States, 10 Cl.Ct. 522 (1986). The Federal Circuit Court’s judgment, was issued
Bradford V. United States ex rel. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management Division of Lands & Mineralspublic domain
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Cleo M. and LaJuan Gay Bradford (Bradford) brought this quiet title action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2409a.1 Named as defendants were the owners of the property to the northwest of the Bradford land, including Pauline Street Johnson, Farmers Union Cooperative Royalty Com*702pany, Flag Oil Corporation, J. D.
Bradford v. United Statespublic domain
651 F.2d 700 Cleo M. BRADFORD and LaJuan Gay Bradford, husband and wife,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,BUREAU OF LANDMANAGEMENT DIVISION OF LANDS ANDMINERALS, Defendant-Appellant,andPauline Street Johnson; Farmers Union Cooperative RoyaltyCompany, acorporation; Flag Oil Corporation of Delaware, acorporation; Flag-Redfern OilCompany, a corporation; and J.D. Lee,
Hyung Seok Koh v. Grafpublic domain
Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Hyung Seok Koh and Eunsook Koh bring this civil rights lawsuit against Northbrook police officers Mark Graf, John Ustich, Charles Wernick, Roger Eisen, Matthew Johnson, Scott Dunham, Bryan Meents, and Keith Celia; Wheeling police officer Sung Phil Kim; and the Villages of Northbrook and Wheeling.1 R. 133, Second Am. Compl.2
McNeil v. Curriepublic domain
JUSTICE McDONOUGH delivered the Opinion of the Court. Linda McNeil appeals from an order of summary judgment granted by the District Court of the Third Judicial District, Deer Lodge County, in favor of defendants Thomas Currie, Farmers Insurance Group, Farmers Insurance Group of Companies and The Truck Insurance Exchange. The District Court held that there were no ge
Hanlon v. Town of Miltonpublic domain
235 Wis.2d 597 (2000) 2000 WI 61 612 N.W.2d 44 James D. HANLON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF MILTON, Town Board of Milton, William Cunningham, Harold Traynor, Ronald Kaiser, Gerald Fredrick, James Clark, and Kenneth Hull, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-1980-CQ. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument January 7, 2000. <
Phelps v. Physicians Insurancepublic domain
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. ¶ 1. We review a published decision of the court of appeals,1 which reversed in part and affirmed in part a decision of the circuit court.2 There are two questions presented for our review: (1) whether Dr. Matthew Lindemann (Lindemann) was a borrowed employee of St. Joseph's Hospital of Milwaukee (St. Joseph's), and was therefore an employee of
324 F.Supp.2d 1152 (2004) Roy B. THOMPSON, Trustee, on behalf of the THORPE FAMILY CHARITABLE REMAINDER UNITRUST, Plaintiff, v. Leonel FEDERICO, a resident of the State of Arizona, and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. a New York corporation, f/k/a Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., Defendants. No. Civ.03-496-MO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. July 8, 2004.
Bradford v. US EX REL. DEPT. OF INTERIOR, ETC.public domain
431 F.Supp. 88 (1977) Cleo M. BRADFORD and Lajuan Gay Bradford, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DIVISION OF LANDS AND MINERALS, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office, Pauline Street Johnson, Farmers Union Cooperative Royalty Company, a corporation, and Flag Oil Corporation of Delaware, a corporation, and Flag-Redfern Oil Company, a corporatio
Jackson v. Robertsonpublic domain
763 F.2d 1176 Ruth JACKSON (Shelp), Imogene L. McBride, George C. Melineand Ethelmae Meline, husband and wife, Earl B. Milton andVirginia L. Milton, husband and wife, Carroll L. Niblack,Marion Niblack, Bill J. Osborn, Clarence E. Patterson andMary E. Patterson, husband and wife, Clarence E. Pattersonand Helen A. Patterson, Olive Poage, Homer S. Potter andInez M. Potter, husband and wife, Donald J. Reed and IreneS. Reed,
Jackson v. Robertsonpublic domain
SETH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the trial court’s order fixing ownership interests in mining claims on federal land. Appellants, defendants below, raise two questions of federal statutory interpretation. They urge that *1179provisions of 43 U.S.C. § 1744 (The 1976 Land Act) operate to void the interests of all appellees. Appellants also contend that man
380 F.Supp. 890 (1974) ST. JOSEPH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, Plaintiff, v. SUN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 72 S 108. United States District Court, N. D. Indiana, South Bend Division. August 23, 1974. *891 Gerald A. Kamm, Bruce H. Stewart, Doran, Manion, Boynton & Kamm, South Be
Hedtcke v. Sentry Insurancepublic domain
109 Wis.2d 461 (1982) 326 N.W.2d 727 Judith A. HEDTCKE, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. No. 81-552. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs October 6, 1982. Decided November 30, 1982. *464 For the plaintiff-petitioner the cause was
BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. Allsop Lumber Company, Inc., instituted this action against D & L Construction Company & Associates, a joint venture, against those comprising the venture, and against Continental Casualty Company, Inc., the venture’s payment bond surety, to recover $93,088.84. This amount was claimed to be the balan
In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Ill., Etc.public domain
480 F.Supp. 1280 (1979) In re AIR CRASH DISASTER NEAR CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, ON MAY 25, 1979. This Document Relates To: 79 C 2272, 79 C 2310, 79 C 2311, 79 C 2440, 79 C 2444-79 C 2446, 79 C 2518, 79 C 2551-79 C 2554, 79 C 2573, 79 C 2730, 79 C 2770, 79 C 2822, 79 C 2823. No. MDL 391. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. December 6, 1979.
Bliss Petroleum Co. v. McNallypublic domain
Plaintiff is a Michigan corporation, organized in September, 1925. In 1926, the directors were defendants, E.C. Vandewalker, now dead, P.T. Slattery, and C.H. Bliss. Defendant Wilson was director, secretary, and manager of the company. August 14, 1926, Wilson, acting for himself, the other defendants, Slattery, and Vandewalker, secured an oil and gas lease from Herman Oehring and wife, took it in the name of John Hopkins, now dead, and, on August 18th, at a regular meeting of
Banker v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
McVICAR, District Judge. Findings of Fact. (1) The patent involved, 1,005,135-, is for an improvement in windshields in relation to hinging the upper and lower sections together, and for the holding of the upper section in a folded position. (2) Arthur L. Banker, the plaintiff, made application for the patent on December 19, 1907, which was granted October 10, 1911, and which expired O