Cases

FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 16 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; No. 17-72917

ORDER Before the court is the government’s emergency motion for a stay of our order of November 16, 2017, which denied the government’s petition for a writ of mandamus and lifted a temporary stay that we had previously imposed. As the order denying mandamus relief was effective immediately upon its issuance, see Ellis v. U.S. Dist. Court, 360 F.3d 1022, 1023 (9

ORDER The court has received the government’s November 17, 2017 emergency stay motion. The Response to the motion is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. PST, and the optional reply is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. PST. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in the response and reply, the parties shall address vyhether this court has j

ORDER Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion of 12/20/2017, we instruct the district court to rule on the Government’s threshold arguments that the Secretary’s decision to rescind DACA is unreviewable as committed to agency discretion and that the Immigration and Nationality Act deprives the district court of jurisdiction. The district court should

*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

157 F.Supp.2d 935 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Octavio MENDOZA, Hugo Gonzalez, and Jesus Jimenez, Defendants. No. 01 CR 320. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 7, 2001. *936 *937 Gerald Joseph Collins, Attorney at Law, Chicago, IL, Kent R. C

*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);

*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);

539 U.S. 953 Garza-Hernandezv.United States.Perez-Huertav.United StatesZapata-Martinezv.United StatesSolis-Brionesv.United StatesCarbajal-Taglev.United StatesMartinez-Rodriguezv.United StatesSalinas-Rodriguezv.United StatesCortes-Gallegosv.United StatesMendoza-Martinezv.United StatesHernandez-Hernandezv.United StatesGonzalez-Medra

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

Case: 22-30656 Document: 298-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-30656 FILED ____________

Case: 23-40033 Document: 172-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/30/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-40033 FILED August 30

*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848

Case: 23-30191 Document: 126-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED May 6, 2024 No. 23-30191

Appellate Case: 22-5017 Document: 010110825891 Date Filed: 03/14/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 14, 2023