Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Jimenez-Gonzalez”
Jimenez-Gonzalez v. Mukaseypublic domain
548 F.3d 557 (2008) Leonel JIMENEZ-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-1071. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 10, 2008. Decided November 21, 2008. *558 Todd A. Gale (argued), Dykema, Chicago, IL, for petitioner. Ka
United States v. Gonzalez-Jimenezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Jaime Gonzalez-Jimenez pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, and the district court sentenced him to 34 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Gonzalez-Jimenez argues that the district court erred by characterizing his state felony conviction for simple possession of cocaine as an “aggravated felony” for p
Jimenez v. Gonzalezpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Jimenez v. Gonzalezpublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Gonzalez-Jimenez De Ruiz v. United Statespublic domain
231 F.Supp.2d 1187 (2002) Luz M. GONZALEZ-JIMENEZ DE RUIZ, on her behalf and on behalf of her minor children, Luis Fernando Ruiz Gonzalez, Jose David Ruiz Gonzalez, Melanie Ruiz Gonzalez, and Araika Ruiz Gonzalez, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 5:00CV371OC10GRJ. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division. November 14, 2002. <
GONZALEZ JIMENEZpublic domain
Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 129 (BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4108 Matter of Pascacio GONZALEZ JIMENEZ, Respondent Decided July 9, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Use of false or stolen Social Security numbers and providing false information on tax returns are negative considerations
Jimenez v. Gonzalezpublic domain
538 U.S. 929 JIMENEZv.GONZALEZ. No. 02-8563. Supreme Court of United States. March 24, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 9th C
MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. This matter arises out of exclusion proceedings before an immigration judge which resulted in an in abstentia order finding Teresa Gonzalez de Jimenez (petitioner) subject to exclusion and deportation following her failure to appear at a hearing. She now petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) de
RAGGI, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Manuel Gonzalez appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on June 4, 2003, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John S. Martin, Jr., Judge) based on defendant’s guilty plea to a single-count indictment charging a conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute f
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT VICLENA MARGARITA GONZALEZ CARRASCO, Appellant, v. MARTIN JOSE PEREZ JIMENEZ, Appellee. Nos. 4D2023-0461 and 4D2023-3105 [March 5, 2025] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Browar
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT VICLENA MARGARITA GONZALEZ CARRASCO, Appellant, v. MARTIN JOSE PEREZ JIMENEZ, Appellee. Nos. 4D2023-0461 and 4D2023-3105 [March 5, 2025] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Browar
United States v. United States District Courtpublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 16 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; No. 17-72917
United States v. United States District Courtpublic domain
ORDER Before the court is the government’s emergency motion for a stay of our order of November 16, 2017, which denied the government’s petition for a writ of mandamus and lifted a temporary stay that we had previously imposed. As the order denying mandamus relief was effective immediately upon its issuance, see Ellis v. U.S. Dist. Court, 360 F.3d 1022, 1023 (9
Leonel Jimenez-Gonzalez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1071 L EONEL JIMENEZ-G ONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. M ICHAEL B. M UKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. No. A42
United States v. Castropublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the defendant’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis (Docket # 627), the government’s opposition thereto (Docket # 651), and defendant’s multiple show-cause responses (Dockets # 661, 666 & 668). For the reasons stated below, the petition for writ of error coram nobis is DENIED.
869 F.2d 9 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Joaquin JIMENEZ-PEREZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jose CABEZA-SOLANO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Melecio PERLAZA, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Cristobal GONZALEZ-PARRA, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 88-1468 to 88-1471. Un
ORDER The court has received the government’s November 17, 2017 emergency stay motion. The Response to the motion is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. PST, and the optional reply is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. PST. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in the response and reply, the parties shall address vyhether this court has j
United States v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Franciscopublic domain
ORDER Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion of 12/20/2017, we instruct the district court to rule on the Government’s threshold arguments that the Secretary’s decision to rescind DACA is unreviewable as committed to agency discretion and that the Immigration and Nationality Act deprives the district court of jurisdiction. The district court should
United States v. McCloskey-Diazpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On October 30, 2009, Joseph McCloskey-Diaz (“McCloskey”), along with several other defendants, was indicted on thirty-three counts of making false statements to a financial institution, bank fraud, conspiracy, monetary laundering, aiding and abetting, and forfeiture allegations. (Docket No. 3.) PROCEDURAL HISTORY On July 2,
United States v. Ramos-Gonzalezpublic domain
747 F.Supp.2d 280 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Cruz Roberto RAMOS-GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. Criminal No. 07-318 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 8, 2010. *283 Fernando J. Carlo-Gorbea, Fernando J. Carlo Law Office, Anita Hill-Adames, Anita Hill Law Office, Robert Millan, Millan Law