⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Jeremy Davis”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0190p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012-08-08 · Published · cited 32× · 689 F.3d 179; 2012 WL 3194313; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16505
REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: Defendants Alton Davis and Roderick Gunn appeal from judgments entered against them on August 24, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (William H. Pauley III, Judge), convicting them of conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robberies of suspected drug dealers, see 18 U.S.C. §
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-02-01 · Published · cited 1× · 24 F.4th 1301
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30141 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. v. 3:15-cr-05197- BHS-1 JEREMY SCHLENKER, 3:15-cr-05197- Defendant-Appellant. BHS JEREMY SCHLENKER,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021-07-02 · Published · cited 13× · 3 F.4th 943
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2353 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEREMY SCHENCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2353 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEREMY SCHENCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-07-29 · Published · cited 10× · 6 F.4th 869
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2086 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jeremy William Lillich Defe
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021-06-14 · Published · cited 7× · 999 F.3d 1017
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0133p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-09-24 · Published · cited 8× · 976 F.3d 656
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0313p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 2× · 122 F.4th 71
22-639 United States v. Davis United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Submitted: February 5, 2024 Decided: November 26, 2024 No. 22-639 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-11-09 · Published · cited 84× · 908 F.3d 183
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. *185 Petitioner Jeremy Snider ("Snider") appeals the district court's denial of his petition for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Griffithpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 638; 196 L. Ed. 2d 538; 85 U.S.L.W. 3325; 2017 WL 69373; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 431
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020-02-12 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nicholas E. DAVIS, Private United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0104 Crim. App. No. 20160069 Argued November 6, 2019
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 76 M.J. 663; 2017 CCA LEXIS 378; 2017 WL 2417746
Judge SANTORO delivered the opinion of the court, in which Senior Judge J. BROWN and Judge HARDING joined. PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT SANTORO, Judge: Officer and enlisted members sitting as a general court-martial convicted Appellant, contrary to his plea, of one specification of intentionally communicating indecent language
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-10-11 · Published · cited 18× · 118 F.4th 830
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0232p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JEREMY MARCHEK, individually and on behalf of all │ others similarly situat
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015-07-01 · Published · cited 4× · 74 M.J. 772; 2015 CCA LEXIS 281; 2013 WL 10904289
PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT ALLRED, Chief Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of making a false official statement, willfully damaging nonmilitary property, rape, and obstruction of justice, in violation of Articles 107, 109, 120, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 909, 920
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 627 F. App'x 926
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-12-02 · Published · cited 9× · 122 F.4th 760
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STERLING ATKINS, No. 20-99008 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:02-cv-01348- v. JCM-BNW JEREMY BEAN, Warden; STATE OF NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OPINION OFFICE, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-07-07 · Published · cited 24× · 28 F. Supp. 3d 256; 2014 WL 3036398
OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) filed this action to: (1) reduce to judgment federal tax assessments made against defendants Jacob Rozbruch and Marsha Rozbruch (the “Rozbruchs”) and East 72nd Street Orthopaedic Surgery Specialists, P.C. (collectively “defendants”); and (2) to foreclose on federal tax
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007-06-27 · Published · cited 49× · 491 F.3d 668; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15232; 2007 WL 1827645
POSNER, Circuit Judge. The government appeals from the imposition of a sentence of one day in prison, time served, for a violation of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. The specific section of the Act that the defendant violated, 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), authorizes, so far as bears on this case, the imposition of a maximum prison sentence of 10 years on anyone who “k
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023-11-03 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1353 ROBERT BEVIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS and JASON ARRES, Defendants-Appellees, and THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,