Cases

SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. (“Jensen”) appeals the final decision of the United States Court of International Trade in Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 11-15, 2011 WL 587174 (Ct. Int’l Trade Feb. 10, 2011). In that decision, the court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Jensen’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i). In its com

Slip Op. 11–15 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE : NORMAN G. JENSEN, INC., : : : Plaintiff, : : Before: Richard K. Eaton, Judge v. : : UNITED STATES, : Court No. 10-00115 : Defendant.

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

JENNIFER C. BOAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *215The United States has moved for authorization to use alternative procedures to notify potential victims, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 3771(d). Docket No. 93. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. I. BACKGROUND T

Post-Award Bid Protest; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Failure to Conform to Material Requirements of the Solicitation; FAR Part 8 Versus FAR Part 15; FAR 1.102-2; Fair and Impartial Treatment; Organizational Conflict of Interest *148 OPINION AND ORDER

OPINION WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: Does a municipality’s bankruptcy plan of adjustment automatically discharge a judgment against individual officers for exces-sive force by operation of a California stat-ute generally requiring public entities to defend and indemnify their employees for actions within the scope of their employment?

663 F.Supp.2d 561 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Christina Rose DENHAM and Brandon Bruce Pitman, Defendants. No. 6:09-CR-07-ART. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, London. September 8, 2009. *562 Jason D. Parman, U.S. Attorney's Office, London, KY, for Plaintiff. Stephanie Lynne

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2023 Decided July 28, 2023 No. 22-5045 JASON L. SISSEL, APPELLANT v. CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the

PER CURIAM. Calvin Hammock brought an action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act arising out of his detention and arrest and criminal charges brought against him that were later dismissed. Upon defendants’ various motions, the District Court1 dismissed some defendants and claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (failure t

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“RJRT”) and Lorillard Tobacco *33 Company (“Lorillard”) (collectively, “Defendants”)

ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the State of Minnesota’s August 10, 2015 proposed revisions to Minnesota’s Olmstead Plan (“Olmstead Plan”). (Doc. No. 486-1.) For the rea*1070sons discussed below, the Court approves the revised Olmstead Plan.

MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Back in 2006, the Court issued its Final Judgment and Remedial Order # 1015 [Dkt. No. 5733], mandating that Defendants publish corrective statements on each of five topics on which the Court found they had made false and deceptive statements. These topics are: “(a) the adverse health effects of sm

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-19-00104-CR __________________ JASON BRIAN HAMLIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ____________________________________________

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 2, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk o

787 F.Supp.2d 68 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-2496 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 1, 2011. *70 Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Consumer Litigation, Ann M. Ravel, U.S. Department of Justic

MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. On November 17, 2011, the parties were ordered to submit their views on (1) whether the Court should defer consideration of the issue of corrective action statements (as well as the issue of advertisement placement in retail stores); and (2) if so, for how long such consideration should be

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY AMANDA KELLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) C.A. No. CPU6-18-001015 ) JASON KNIPE, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: April 29, 2022 Decided: July 22, 2022 Bruce A. Rogers, Esquire Jason Knipe Bruce A. Roger, P.A. Defendant 12 S. Front Street Pro Se Georgetown, DE 19947 Attorney for Plaintiff DECISION AFTER TRIAL Amanda Kelley (“Plaintiff’) brought this action against Jason Knipe (“Defendant”), through her legal counsel, deman

444 F.3d 537 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Kevin McCLAIN; George Brandt; Jason Davis, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-5887. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 31, 2006. Robert Anderson, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Nashville, TN, Thomas M. Gannon, U.S. Department of

234 S.W.3d 198 (2007) Clarence JENSEN, Appellant, v. Jason COVINGTON, Appellee. No. 10-06-00159-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. August 8, 2007. Rehearing Overruled September 18, 2007. *200 Tom D. Rorie, Nacogdoches, for appellant. Thomas R. McLeroy, Jr., Center, for appellee. Before Chief Justi

KELLY, Circuit Judge. The Minnesota Department of Human Services (MDHS) appeals from a post-judgment order of the district court 1 concluding that the court retained jurisdiction to enforce the stipulated class action settlement agreement (Agreement) MDHS entered into with plaintiffs (collectively, the Jensen class). The Jens