Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alberto Gonzalez-Jaimes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Jaimes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, several landowners appeal the district court’s judgments and fair-market-value findings in the government’s condemnation claims for land used to expand Everglades National Park. After review and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court properly rejected the Land Commission’s application of a 5% annual appreciation in the value of the recreational parcel

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mateo Jaime Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance -with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gonzalez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions o

SUMMARY ORDER Jaime Gonzalez appeals from a judgment of conviction entered March 31, 2006 principally sentencing Gonzalez to life imprisonment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the procedural history of the case. We review the district court’s sentence for reasonableness. United States v. Selioutsky, 409 F.3d 114, 118 (2d Cir.2005). We review the factual findings underlying a district cou

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 202.

556 F.3d 36 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rodrigo CAMPUSANO, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Jaime Pinillos, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 07-1931, 07-2442. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard January 8, 2009. Decided February 13, 2009. *38 Jo

624 F.3d 405 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime REYES-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-1249, 09-1551. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 13, 2009. Decided October 7, 2010.

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: Jaime Moreno-Gonzalez appeals his jury conviction for possession with the intent to distribute over 100 kilograms of marijuana based on insufficient evidence. Because there was sufficient evidence with which a jury could have convicted Moreno-Gonzalez, we AFFIRM his conviction. FACTS Moreno-Gon

PER CURIAM: * Kaye Shaw Marr appeals her sentence for conspiring to manufacture, distribute, or possess with the intent to manufacture or distribute more than five but less than *91550 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and for possession of pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violatio

PER CURIAM: * Jaime Gonzales-Ramirez’s court-appointed counsel has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gonzalez-Ramirez has not responded to the motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to wit

PER CURIAM: * Jaime Gonzalez-Jimenez pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, and the district court sentenced him to 34 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Gonzalez-Jimenez argues that the district court erred by characterizing his state felony conviction for simple possession of cocaine as an “aggravated felony” for p

MEMORANDUM ** A jury convicted Defendant Jaime Gustavo Gaytan-Gonzalez of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. During Defendant’s trial, the government presented evidence of a prior conviction for possession of methamphetamine for sale, for the purpose of proving knowledge and intent. The district court gave the jury a limiting instruction regar

MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Gonzalez-Edeza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gonzalez-Edeza has filed a brief stating that he finds no gr

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant (“Appellant”) was charged with conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(a). He was convicted after a jury trial at which he testified on his own behalf. Following trial, for reasons that are not relevant to this order, the case was reassigned to a new judge for sentencing. At sentencing, the district court ma

*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Jaime Hernandez-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmanc

MEMORANDUM** Antonio Gonzalez-Radiya appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawfully entering the United States *880after having been previously deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Gonzalez-Radiya contends that the district court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory when imposing his

MEMORANDUM ** Fausto Jaime Gutierrez and Augustin Antonio Gonzalez Meza appeal their 188-month sentences imposed after a jury convicted them of possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm. *416Gutierrez