Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Jafari”
United States v. Jafaripublic domain
DECISION & ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Defendant Nina Jafari (“Defendant”), charged in a five count indictment with health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (Dkt. 1), was convicted after a jury trial on September 29, 2014, of counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, and acquitted of the charges in *319cou
United States v. Jafaripublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Nina Jafari (“Defendant”), charged in a five count indictment with health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (Dkt. 1), was convicted after a jury trial on September 29, 2014, of counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, and acquitted of the charges in count 4 (Dkt. 82). On November 24, 2014, the Government
United States v. Jafaripublic domain
DECISION & ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. Defendant Nina Jafari (“Defendant”) is charged with five counts of healthcare fraud allegedly in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347. (Dkt. 1). Trial was scheduled to commence on June 17,, 2014. (Dkt. 39). On May 18, 2014, Defendant’s attorney, Robert Ross Fogg, Esq. (“Mr. Fogg”), *293filed a mot
United States v. Jafari Moorepublic domain
OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. A federal jury convicted Jafari Moore of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.. His principal claim on appeal is that the district court should have instructed the jury about his affirmative defense that he possessed the gun out of necessity. We affirm. I. Jafari Moo
United States v. Jafaripublic domain
908 F.2d 968 U.S.v.Jafari (Jafar), All African Peoples' Revolutionary Party,American Indian Movement/ International Indian TreatyCouncil, El Portido La Raza Unida, New Afrikan Peoples'Organization, National Black United Front, Republic of NewAfrika, Piscataway Indian Nation, Center for ConstitutionalRights, Commission for Racial Justice of United Church ofChrist, National Rainbow Coalition N
Jafari v. United Statespublic domain
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until January 3, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance *607with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Jafari v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The pro se plaintiff, Emmett Johnson Jafari, brings the instant suit against the United States after years of litigation in Virginia. Essentially, the plaintiff is dissatisfied with the outcome of his suits before the courts of the Eastern District of Virginia and the Fourth Circuit, among others, and seeks damages under the
Jafari v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s complaint on the ground of judicial immunity be affirmed. See Mireles
Faris v. Jafari (In Re Jafari)public domain
401 B.R. 494 (2009) In re Bahram Amir JAFARI, Debtor. Roseann Faris, The Estate of Stella Delucia, and Rodney Nusse, Plaintiffs, v. Bahram Amir Jafari, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-16717 EEB. Adversary No. 07-01675 EEB. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. February 3, 2009. *495 Kenneth J. Buechler, Denver, CO, for Pl
Jafari v. Old Dominion Transit Mgmt. Co.public domain
Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 1318.Petition for rehearing denied.
Jafari v. Old Dominion Transit Mgmt. Co.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jafari v. Williamspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Emmett Johnson Jafari appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jafari v. Williams, No. CA-01-253-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 2001). We further deny Jafari’s motion to strike Appellees’ informal brief
Keshtkar Jafari v. Pompeopublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SINA KESHTKAR JAFARI, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:19-cv-1819-RCL ) MICHAEL R. POMPEO, ) et al.,
United States v. Mylespublic domain
GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On October 19, 2017, the grand jury returned an Indictment against Defendant Lucian Myles for possession with intent to distribute codeine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), possession of a stolen firearm in violati
State of Missouri v. Jafari R. Bosspublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) WD81763 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: June 25, 2019 ) JAFARI R. BOS
LAMONT, JAFARI, PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1090 KA 09-02474 PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAFARI LAMONT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JAFARI LAMONT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
Desert Palace Inc. v. Jafari (In Re Jafari)public domain
(2008) In re Robert B. JAFARI and Poopak A. Jafari, Debtors. Desert Palace Inc., d/b/a Caesar's Palace Hotel & Casino, Appellant, v. Robert B. Jafari, Poopak A. Jafari and Mark Wittman, Trustee, Appellees. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, Appellant, v. Robert B. Jafari, Poopak A. Jafari and Mark Wittman, Trustee, Appellees. Nos. 07-cv-693-bbc, 07-cv-694-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. W
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 1358.Petition for rehearing denied.
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Jafaripublic domain
378 B.R. 575 (2007) In re Robert Bahram JAFARI and Poopak Amanda Jafari, Debtors. No. 06-10155-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin. October 16, 2007. *576 *577 Leonard Leverson, Leverson & Metz S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Debtors. Mark J. Wittman, Gorski & Wittman, S.C., Mar