Cases

BARRETT, District Judge. While I concur that the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress the statements obtained from the traffic stop, I write separately to address the issue of whether there was probable cause for the stop. The Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before K.J. BRUBAKER, A.Y. MARKS, J.P. ELLINGTON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRICK N. HUFF CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201500313 SPECIAL COU

McKAY, Circuit Judge. This case primarily concerns the limits to a district court’s discretion when ruling on government motions for reconsideration. The district court initially ruled to suppress evidence of firearms seized during the arrest of Appellant Dana J. Huff, but the court agreed to reconsider the motion after the government presented a new legal basis for the seizur

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Jordan Huff and Marcus Major appeal from their sentences imposed by the district court following remand. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Huff and Major contend that the district court erred in its interpretation of the scope of our remand when it declined to conduct a plenary resentencing hearing. We review the distri

641 F.3d 1228 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry C. HUFF, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-4079. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 19, 2011. *1229 Submitted on the briefs:[*] Steven B. Killpack, Utah Federal Defender, Scott Keith Wilson, Assistant Federal Defender, and Da

ORDER Robert Huff gave up his law practice and joined an established network that was growing marijuana on the west coast and selling it in Chicago and Milwaukee. The group was already under investigation when Huff became involved, and within a few months he and 30 others had been arrested by federal authorities. Huff pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess and distribute marijuana, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and stipul

514 F.3d 818 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Allen HUFF, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-1500. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 16, 2007. Filed: January 30, 2008. *819 Troy K. Stabenow, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Jefferson City, MO, argued (Raymond C.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* MICHAEL W. McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Michael Huff pleaded guilty to online enticement of a child in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The district court sentenced him to 210 months imprisonment and ten years of supervised release. Mr. Huff challenges the reasonableness and constitutionality of his sentence. Exercising jurisdiction under

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D REVISED MAY 27, 2004 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 13, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

ORDER This is a direct appeal from a judgment and commitment order in a criminal prosecution. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). In 2001, Markus Huff was indicted for his role in a scheme to commit bank fraud. Huff proceeded to tri

246 F.Supp.2d 721 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. W. Anthony HUFF, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:00CR-123-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, At Louisville. February 6, 2003. *722 Stephen Beville Pence, United States Attorney's Office, Joseph M. Whittle, Pedley Zielke Gordinier, David Allen Lambertus, R

7 F.3d 229 U.S.v.Huff* NO. 93-1333 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Oct 08, 1993 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2 AFFI

37 F.3d 637 U.S.v.Huff** NO. 93-8355 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 20, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2

988 F.2d 1213 U.S.v.Huff* NO. 92-1611 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 19, 1993 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2 A

983 F.2d 231 U.S.v.Huff* NO. 92-1654 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Dec 29, 1992 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2 AF

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Kelly Huff appeals the District Court’s judgment of sentence following the revocation of her supervised release. Huff contends that her sentence of ten months’ incarceration was substantively unreasonable. Because Huff was unconditionally released from custody on August 31, 2012, we will dismiss her appeal as

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.