Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-2432 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. This case is before me on plaintiffs October 7, 2013, motion (Doc. No. 19) for leave to file a first amended complaint. Defendant has filed a resistance (Doc. No. 21). Neither party has requested oral argument and, in any event, I find that oral argument is not necessary. See N.D. Ia. L.R. 7(c). The motion is fully submitted.

MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Mariano Huerta-Orosco (“defendant”) appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa 1 upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, crack cocaine, and powder cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. Kevin Petroske was found guilty of eight counts of production or attempted production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251 (a) and 2251(e) and one count of possession of child pornography in violation of

666 F.3d 1087 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Reginald JEAN-GUERRIER, Appellant. No. 11-1884. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 10, 2012. Filed: February 2, 2012. *1089 Erin Griebel, argued, Adam Douglas Fein, on the brief, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Alliso

RILEY, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Duane Big Eagle of conspiracy to commit bribery of an Indian tribal official, and aiding and abetting a bribery involving an agent of an Indian tribal government, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 666(a), and 2. The district court 1

MEMORANDUM ** Raimundo Martinez-Orosco appeals the sentence imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. Martinez-Orosco’s contention that the supervised release regime is unconstitutional and that United States v. HuertaPimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.2006), has been undermined by the Supreme Court’s decision in Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. 270, 127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2

749 F.Supp. 1450 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Timmy COBBINS, et al. Crim. No. 89-295. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. October 24, 1990. *1451 John O. Braud, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for U.S. Wayne Mancuso, Harahan, La., for defendant Henry Lee. Ronald J. Rakosky, New Orleans, La., for

MANSFIELD, Justice. Relying on a 1987 court order, developers sought the right to build apartments on certain adjoining properties they owned in Iowa City. After the City denied their site plans, the developers brought separate actions against the City and its Board of Adjustment. The district court ruled