⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Honda”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010-06-02 · Published · cited 18× · 607 F.3d 771; 32 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1097; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 11121; 2010 WL 2179157
607 F.3d 771 (2010) HONDA OF AMERICA MFG., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2009-1493. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 2, 2010. *772 Jeremy Page, Page Fura, P.C., of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Shannon E. Fura. Edward F. Ke
United States Court of International Trade · 2009-06-05 · Published · cited 2× · 625 F. Supp. 2d 1324; 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 649; 33 C.I.T. 649; 31 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1507; 2009 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 57
625 F.Supp.2d 1324 (2009) HONDA OF AMERICA MFG., INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 09-51. Court No. 05-00058. United States Court of International Trade. June 5, 2009. *1325 Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A. (Jeremy Ross Page and Shannon E. Fura[1]) and Lowell B. Howard, Jr., of counsel, for th
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 170 A.3d 981
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 170 A.3d 981
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 170 A.3d 981
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-10-20 · Published · cited 0× · 584 F. App'x 180
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raymond A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-01-30 · Published · cited 7× · 245 F. Supp. 2d 602; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1591; 2003 WL 257561
245 F.Supp.2d 602 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. 2001 HONDA ACCORD EX VIN # 1HGCG22561A035829, Defendant. No. CIV.A.3:02-CV-0831. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. January 30, 2003. *604 Christopher H. Casey, U.S. Attorney's Office, Scranton, PA, for Plaintiff. James A. Swetz, Cramer, Swetz &
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-04-07 · Published · cited 0× · 179 L. Ed. 2d 798; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2820; 131 S. Ct. 1848; 563 U.S. 931
The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court. Same case below, 322 S.W.3d 136.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-04-07 · Published · cited 0× · 563 U.S. 931
Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 176 L. Ed. 2d 156; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1077; 130 S. Ct. 1573; 559 U.S. 964; 78 U.S.L.W. 3482
Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 558 U.S. 1031, 130 S. Ct. 638, 175 L. Ed. 2d 490, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8299.
District Court, District of Columbia · 1992-05-28 · Published · cited 4× · 143 F.R.D. 1; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9149; 1992 WL 143721
MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO INTERVENE GESELL, District Judge. The Court has before it for final resolution a Motion to Intervene for Limited Purpose Requesting Court to Enforce and Modify Consent Decree. The motion was filed on September 17, 1991, and is directed to the Consent Decree approved by the Court on April 28, 1988. Movants represent consumer, pediatric and public interest groups. They contend, in sweep
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 894; 126 S. Ct. 181
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 1040
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 1040; 121 S. Ct. 2003
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1151
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006-02-24 · Published · cited 0× · 416 F. Supp. 2d 1368; 2006 WL 488526
416 F.Supp.2d 1368 (2006) In re AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., OIL FILTER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Walter Yasensky v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., M.D. Florida, C.A. No. 8:05-1819 Hal Pilger v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., N.D. Illinois, C.A. No. 1:05-5277 Richard Ammon v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., D. Maryland, C.A. No. 1:05-2703 Pauline McDevitt v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., D. Massa
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 814
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1151; 125 S. Ct. 1334; 73 U.S.L.W. 3495; 161 L. Ed. 2d 115; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 1537
543 U.S. 1151 BACON ET AL.v.HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING, INC. No. 04-842. Supreme Court of United States. February 22, 2005. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 370 F. 3d 565.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 814; 119 S. Ct. 49; 142 L. Ed. 2d 38; 67 U.S.L.W. 3229; 1998 U.S. LEXIS 4818
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007-02-05 · Published · cited 4× · 360 B.R. 104; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 259; 2007 WL 329205
360 B.R. 104 (2007) Michael J. SZALINSKI and Sara F. Szalinski, Debtors. Honda Lease Trust, Movant, v. Michael J. Szalinski and Sara F. Szalinski, Respondents. No. 06-22423 JAD. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 5, 2007. *105 Brian E. Caine, Deily Mooney Glastetter LLP, Marlton, NJ, for Movant. <