Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARY HOLZHAUER, Individually and No. 16-15942 as the Personal Representative of Harry Holzhauer, deceased, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant- 3:13-cv-02862- Appellant, JST v. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, a governmental entity, Defendant, and DAVID

522 U.S. 252 (1998) ROGERS v. UNITED STATES No. 96-1279. United States Supreme Court. Argued November 5, 1997. Decided January 14, 1998. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT *253 Stevens, J., announced the decision of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Thomas, Ginsbu

697 A.2d 89 (1997) 346 Md. 328 Eugene HOLZHAUER, v. SAKS & CO. and Montgomery Elevator Co. Misc. No. 21, September Term, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. July 25, 1997. *90 Domenic R. Iamele (Bruce A. Goldstein, Levy & Iamele, Baltimore; Joseph S. Matricciani, Lutherville) all on brief, for Appe

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Lacy Thomas and Colette Thomas, who are not related to one another, each worked during different periods as the Assistant Vice-President and Controller for the Mile Square Health Center (“Mile Square”), a not-for-profit westside Chicago community health clinic! Percy Giles, an Alderman for the 37th Ward of the City of Chicago, served on Mile Square’s Board of Directors, as Mile Square’s Treasurer, and a

PRESIDING JUSTICE GREEN delivered the opinion of the court: On May 8, 1985, plaintiff Vulcan Materials Company (Vulcan) filed suit in the circuit court of Livingston County against defendants Norman and Janice Holzhauer seeking a declaratory judgment that a lease of realty for a quarrying operation was still in force. Defendant

41 F.3d 1109 94-2 USTC P 50,607, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1049,Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 14318B Lacy THOMAS, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,andColette Thomas and Percy Giles, Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee. Nos. 93-3186, 93-3483 and 93-3484*.<

The following opinion was filed January 13, 1931: Owen, J. The specific legal question involved is whether the plaintiff, as a residuary legatee of the estate of Emma Zartner, deceased, may maintain in his own name an action to recover a fractional part of the damages alleged- to have been sustained by Emma Zartner during her lifetime because of fraud and deceit practiced upon her by the defendant. This question

632 F.Supp. 17 (1986) UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA and Its Locals 68, 7508, and 196, Plaintiffs, v. Raymond J. DONOVAN, Secretary of Labor, Defendant. Court No. 83-7-00944. United States Court of International Trade. March 12, 1986. *18 Bredhoff & Kaiser (James D. Holzhauer, Washington, D.C., on motion), for plaintiffs.

BREWSTER, District Judge. These two infringement suits involve the same patents and were tried together. •In each case the defenses were anticipation, noninvention, and noninfringement. The patents involved are Murphy, No. *10071,378,604; reissue patent to Steinman, No. 17,821; and llolzhauer, No. 1,721,663. Statement of Facts.

527 U.S. 516 (1999) MURPHY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. No. 97-1992. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 27, 1999. Decided June 22, 1999. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT *517 O'Connor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia, Ken

37 Wis.2d 238 (1967) NICHOLS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Respondent.[*] Supreme Court of Wisconsin. November 27, 1967. December 22, 1967. *242 For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Charles Saggio of Milwaukee. For the respondent there was a brief by

Cline, Judge: This is a suit against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a part of the duty assessed on merchandise *206invoiced as "Extracted Soya Bean Oil Cake Meal” imported from Dairen, Manchuria. The- appraiser’s advisory classification on the invoice is “Fine bolted flour from soy beans” and duty was assessed at the rate of 35 per centum ad val

499 U.S. 187 (1991) INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW, ET AL. v. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. No. 89-1215. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued October 10, 1990. Decided March 20, 1991. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). We can see no reason to say that there were involved in this ease two separate schemes to defraud'. Such a scheme, when shared among several, becomes a conspiracy, so that in fact the conspiracy count adds nothing of substance to the charge, except as it relieves the prosecution of the necessity of showing the connection of all the defendants to be charged at the date of

736 F.2d 992 38 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1042,34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,456, 39 Fed.R.Serv.2d 323 J.W. ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs,v.BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Sparrows Point, Maryland;United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 2609;United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 2610,United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Appellees.Alfred Franklin SMITH, Leroy S. Aiken, William C

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Jewel Companies, which operates a chain of supermarkets, reached a collective bargaining agreement with Local 881 of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union in September 1982. The agreement ran until June 1985. In December 1983 Jewel asked the Union to agree to a reduction in wages and benefits notwithstanding the agreement. The Union refused. Je

371 B.R. 923 (2007) In re Jason C. McALISTER, Debtor. Thomas J. King, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Ernie von Schledorn, Inc., Jason C. McAlister, and Sharon McAlister (non-filing spouse), Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 06-21027-jes. Adversary No. 06-2458. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 12, 2007. *924 Michael J. Wa

536 U.S. 73 (2002) CHEVRON U. S. A. INC. v. ECHAZABAL No. 00-1406. United States Supreme Court. Argued February 27, 2002. Decided June 10, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *74 *75 Souter, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Cou

514 U.S. 938 (1995) FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC. v. KAPLAN ET AL. No. 94-560. United States Supreme Court. Argued March 22, 1995. Decided May 22, 1995. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT *940 Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. James D. Holz

520 U.S. 510 (1997) INTER-MODAL RAIL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., et al. No. 96-491. United States Supreme Court. Argued March 17, 1997. Decided May 12, 1997. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *511 O'Connor, J., delivered th