Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Donald G. Hogue appeals from the 11-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Hogue contends that the district court gave an inadequate statement of reasons for the sentence. Because Hogue did not previously object to the adequacy of the *4

ORDER Hymme Hogue pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm after being convicted of a felony, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was sentenced at the top of the guideline range to 87 months’ imprisonment. Hogue appeals, but his appointed counsel now moves to withdraw because she cannot discern a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pursuant to Circuit Rule 51(b), we

REVISED, JANUARY 28, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 96-11378 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee VERSUS KENNY HOGUE and JESSE MEEKS, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from

SULLIVAN, Judge (concurring in the result): Appellant’s case was tried in April of 1993. The provision at issue was paragraph 57c(2)(c), Part IV, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. It states: (c) Proof. The falsity of the allegedly perjured statement cannot be proved by circumstantial evidence alone, except with respect to matters which by their nature ar

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1580 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Kelli Suzanne Hogue, formerly known as Kelli Suzanne Cashion

OPINION OF THE COURT YOUNG, Senior Judge: Court members convicted appellant of false swearing in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1988), and sentenced him to confinement for 6 months and forfeiture of $2,500 pay per month for 6 months. The Judge Advocate General referred the case to this Court pursuant to Article 69(d), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869(d) (1988), and invited our attention to three

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID C. HOGUE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th

826 F.2d 15 U.S.v.Hogue (Spencer Jr.) NO. 85-7518 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JUL 24, 1987 S.D.Ala., 812 F.2d 1568 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.

*852Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

ORDER EDENFIELD, District Judge. Defendant in this case has been indicted for the possession of 3,365 gallons of illegal liquor, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5205(a) (2) and 5604(a) (1), and for possessing 4,000 pounds of sugar, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 5686. She has also been indicted for having concealed some 2,166 gallons of the above illegal liquor, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 5601 (a) (12).

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

DENNIS, Circuit Judge: This is the second appeal involving the prosecution of Jesse B. Meeks (“Meeks”) and *1088Kenny Ray Hogue (“Hogue”)on an indictment under 18 U.S.C. § 656 for the misappropriation of Krugerrands from safe deposit boxes in the vault of First Republic Bank Dallas, N.A. (the “Bank”). At the time of their alleged offenses, Meeks and Hogue were enga

221 B.R. 786 (1998) In re James Arvil HOGUE, Sr., Debtor. Mary S. KLENDA, Guardian of the Estate of Jewell Levone Young, Plaintiff, v. James A. HOGUE, Sr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 97-01391-TRC, Adversary No. 97-0140-TRC. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma. May 22, 1998. *787 Sidney K. Swinson, Tulsa, OK, Carol J.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

SETH, Circuit Judge. Appellant, Raymond Hogue, was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1112 and 1153 in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico for the fatal stabbing of Robert Benny. He received a ten-year prison term. Appellant appeals his conviction, contending, among other theories, that the trial court should have granted

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied. Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution.