Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Hillegass”
United States v. Hillegasspublic domain
HOLLAND, District Judge. The defendant was indicted under section 5209, Rev. St. (U. 'S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497), for aiding and abetting Morris L. Hartman, the cashier of the Farmers’ National Bank of Boyertown, to misapply its funds, which section, so far as material to this cause, is as follows: “Every * * * cashier * * * or agent of any association who * willfully misapplies any of the moneys, fun
United States v. Gary Cardacipublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. The government has been trying to collect unpaid taxes assessed against Gary S. Cardaci, and, to that end, it sought the judicial sale of the home he owns in New Jersey with his wife, Beverly. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey concluded that a forced sale would be inequitable and ins
State v. Hillegasspublic domain
DECISION. The state appeals from the trial court's decision suppressing evidence. The defendant also assigns error,1 objecting to the trial court's admission of "bolstering" testimony in the suppression hearing. We reverse. Defendant-appellee Jack D. Hillegass was indicted as a major drug offender2 for possession of,
Hillegass v. Statepublic domain
The State of Alabama filed a petition to condemn, pursuant to §20-2-93, Ala. Code 1975, $22,003 in currency found in an automobile after the occupants of the automobile, Christopher Schmidt and Jack Hillegass, had been arrested on charges of possessing a controlled substance. Hillegass filed a motion claiming ownership of the funds claimed by the State in its condemnation action. At trial, however, Hillegass claimed ownership of only $12,000 in curre
Hillegass v. Landwehrpublic domain
176 Wis.2d 76 (1993) 499 N.W.2d 652 Donald V. HILLEGASS and Karen L. Hillegass, Plaintiffs, v. Gregory P. LANDWEHR and Farmers Insurance Exchange, Defendants-Respondents, EMPLOYERS HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY and DEF Insurance Company, Defendants, BURLINGTON AIR EXPRESS and Protective Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-0619. Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Hillegass v. United Statespublic domain
LANNING, Circuit Judge. The defendant, De Witt C. Hillegass, was convicted in the lower court under an indictment charging him with aiding and abetting the cashier of the Farmers’ National Bank of Boyertown, Pa., in the misapplication of funds of the bank, contrary to the provisions of section 5209 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497). Judgment having been pronounced against him, he now pr
Hillegass v. Rohmpublic domain
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania denied.
Crystal M. Rogers v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police, Vincent W. Joyce, Ronald L. Hillegasspublic domain
118 F.3d 1577 Crystal M. Rogersv.Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police,Vincent W. Joyce, Ronald L. Hillegass NO. 96-7657 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. June 25, 1997 Appeal From: M.D.Pa. ,No.95cv01809 , Rambo, J.
Hillegass v. Levypublic domain
Knight, P. J., We have before us preliminary objections to a complaint which sets forth the following facts. In February 1954 one Elsa Wolff, a citizen of Great Britain residing in Glasgow, Scotland, desired to visit the United States. Before she could obtain a visa she was required to obtain the following certificate: “To whom it may concern: “This is to inform you that I herewith invi
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................161 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................
OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. These consolidated cases are before the Court on the parties’ objections to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola dated February 3, 2011. In that report and recommendation, Magistrate Judge Facciola recommended (1) that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment be granted o
Hillegass' Petitionpublic domain
Diefenderfer, J., — This case was presented upon a petition filed under section 315 of the Nationality Act of October 14, 1940, 54 Stat. at L. 1137, by William Samuel Hillegass, Jr., for naturalization, on behalf of his son, William Samuel Hillegass, 3rd, who was born June 15, 1945, in Cambridge, England. Petitioner, the father, was horn October 26, 1924, in the United States, and his son lawfully entered the United States for pe
Haldeman v. Hillegass, Chm.public domain
Montgomery County, on December 10, 1937, established a retirement system for county employes and officers, to commence January 1, 1938.1 Appellant, the *Page 378 duly elected prothonotary, who had served in that capacity from January 3, 1922, to January 3, 1938, immediately notified the county retirement board of his intention to become a member of the system. On December 31, 1937, he received his last salary pay
United States v. Birrellpublic domain
242 F.Supp. 191 (1965) UNITED STATES of America, v. Lowell M. BIRRELL, Defendant. United States District Court S. D. New York. June 11, 1965. *192 *193 Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, Gerald Walpin, Paul R. Grand, Otto G. Obermaier, Asst. U. S. Attys., of counsel, for Unite
United States v. George Spearepublic domain
HAYS, Circuit Judge. Speare appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the Southern District of New York upon the verdict of a jury finding him guilty on 27 counts of an indictment charging him with aiding and abetting an officer of a federally insured bank in misapplying funds of the bank, and with conspiracy to do so. (18 U.S.C. §§ 656, 371.) Speare was sentenced to one
United States v. Caplanpublic domain
123 F.Supp. 862 (1954) UNITED STATES v. CAPLAN. No. 13609. United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania. August 13, 1954. *863 Edward C. Boyle, U. S. Atty., W. Wendell Stanton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff. Elliott W. Finkel, Maurice Baruth, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant. MURPHY, District Ju
Mulloney v. United Statespublic domain
79 F.2d 566 (1935) MULLONEY et al. v. UNITED STATES.[*] No. 2974. Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit. July 13, 1935. Rehearing Denied November 7, 1935. *567 *568 *569 *570 Marvin C. Taylo
Luxenberg v. United Statespublic domain
45 F.2d 497 (1930) LUXENBERG v. UNITED STATES.[*] No. 2941. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. November 17, 1930. Charles N. Campbell, of Martinsburg, W. Va., and Sam T. Spears, of Elkins, W. Va. (Howard H. Emmert, of Martinsburg, W. Va., on the brief), for appellant. *498 William C. Howard, Asst. U. S. A
Havener v. United Statespublic domain
15 F.2d 503 (1926) HAVENER v. UNITED STATES. No. 7228. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. November 1, 1926. *504 William A. Bryans, of Denver, Colo., for plaintiff in error. Alton H. Skinner, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Topeka, Kan. (Al F. Williams, U. S. Atty., and Frank H. McFarland, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Topeka, K
United States v. Pylepublic domain
BLEDSOE, District Judge (after stating the facts as above). Defendants Pyle and Conner were prosecuted under section 5209 of the Revised Statutes for a misapplication of the funds of the National Bank *292& Trust Company of Pasadena. Defendant Pyle was charged as an officer of the bank, and defendant Conner as an aider and abettor of Pyle. The statute, being intended