⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Hernandez-Zavala”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-01-07 · Published · cited 1× · 984 F.3d 457
Case: 18-40669 Document: 00515697366 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 7, 202
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 976; 206 L. Ed. 2d 131
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-11-20 · Published · cited 7× · 806 F.3d 259; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20160; 2015 WL 7351756
Petition for review denied by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge FLOYD and Senior Judge Hamilton joined. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Hernán Hernandez-Zavala petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA’s”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“U’s”) pretermission of Hernandez-Zavala’s application for cancell
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 314 F. Supp. 3d 744
Judge Kathleen Cardone This consolidated appeal acutely illustrates the difficult and controversial nature of our country's immigration laws and their enforcement. Appellants are five asylum seekers who were apprehended shortly after entering into the United States with their minor children. Ultimately, they were separated from the children, prosecuted by the government for the misdemeanor offense of improper entry under
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-05-08 · Published · cited 8× · 924 F.3d 164
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: In unrelated incidents between October 21, 2017 and October 23, 2017, Appellants Blanca Nieve Vasquez-Hernandez, Elba Luz Dominguez-Portillo, Maynor Alonso Claudino-Lopez, Jose Francis Yanes-Mancia, and Natividad Zavala-Zavala were each apprehended by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) soon after entering the United States from Mexico. Appellants,
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 1870; 191 L. Ed. 2d 743
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2024-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
VACATE AND AFFIRM IN PART, REVERSE IN PART, AND REMAND and Opinion Filed March 26, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01077-CV JOSE LUIS VARELA AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARIA SOLEDAD VARELA DE LOPEZ (DECEASED), CARMEN HERNANDEZ, JOSE HERNANDEZ, MARICELA SILVA, ELIGIO SILVA, AND PEDRO ROSTRO, Appellants
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2024-10-21 · Published · cited 0×
VACATE AND AFFIRM IN PART, REVERSE IN PART, AND REMAND and Opinion Filed October 21st, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01077-CV JOSE LUIS VARELA AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARIA SOLEDAD VARELA DE LOPEZ (DECEASED), CARMEN HERNANDEZ, JOSE HERNANDEZ, MARICELA SILVA, ELIGIO SILVA, AND PEDRO ROSTRO, Appellants
Supreme Court of the United States · 2006-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 1114; 126 S. Ct. 1076
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 97 F. App'x 305
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-03-06 · Published · cited 0× · 61 F. App'x 690
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 1106; 122 S. Ct. 2314; 70 U.S.L.W. 3725; 152 L. Ed. 2d 1068; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 3991
535 U.S. 1106 PEREZ-SANCHEZv.UNITED STATES;BARAJAS-RAMOSv.UNITED STATES;BUSTOS-BENITEZ, AKA ACEVEDO-ACEVEDOv.UNITED STATES;CORTEZ-OROZCO, AKA TAPIA ORTIZv.UNITED STATES;DIAZ-ZAVALA, AKA CASANOVAv.UNITED STATES;GARCIA-HERNANDEZ, AKA OCAMPO-ROSAv.UNITED STATES;GARCIA-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATES;GUILLEN-OROZCOv.<
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-50051 Document: 90-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/08/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-50051 August 8, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 1106
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-07-08 · Published · cited 2× · 142 F.4th 1174
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3262 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:23-cr-00139- JAS-MAA-1 v. WARDY ALFONSO LIBERATO OPINION Defendant
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 1106
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 119 F.4th 571
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3012 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Joseph Garner l
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-10-21 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3012 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Joseph Garner l
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022-08-09 · Published · cited 20× · 43 F.4th 1100
Appellate Case: 21-2058 Document: 010110722090 Date Filed: 08/09/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 9, 2022
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, AMENDED OPINION *