Cases

778 F.Supp.2d 1108 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Eduardo HERNANDEZ-MEJIA, Defendant. No. CR 05-0469 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 30, 2011. *1109 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Larry Gomez, Damon P. Martinez, Assistant United States Attorneys, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM ** Eduardo Hernandez-Mejia appeals his conviction for unlawful re-entry to the United States by a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by collaterally attacking his initial deportation for being an aggravated felon. At issue is whether Hernandez-Mejia’s conviction under Cal. Pen. Code § 496(a) is categorically an aggravated felony. See Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 60

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anner Saul Mejia-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mejia-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re

MEMORANDUM ** The district court did not abuse its discretion when it imposed a consecutive sentence. Sentencing Guidelines § 5G1.3(c) allows sentencing courts to impose a consecutive sentence in order to achieve a reasonable punishment for the offense. In determining what punishment would be reasonable, the district court properly considered the factors set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). United States v.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1508 ELIZABETH MEJIA-HERNANDEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of an O

Opinion by Judge GOODWIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge ZOUHARY. OPINION GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: In view of a number of pending immigration cases calling into question the continued vitality of Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir.2002), we must decide whether we can review a BIA decision against reopening in the context of a claim of equitable tolling. We

ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed December 20, 2016, arid' appearing at 844 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2016), are withdrawn. The opinion may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. A concurrently issued amended memorandum disposition ' addresses all of the issues before the court. Pursuant to the court’s May 31, 2017 order (No.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50051 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00578- JFW-7 MANUEL YEPIZ, AKA Martin Sanchez, Seal G and Pony; Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50062 Plainti

SUMMARY ORDER Co-defendants-appellants Manuel Geral-do, Hargelis Vargas, and Jugo Cespedes (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from sentences and final judgments of conviction entered on October 30, 2015, November 25, 2015, and December 3, 2015, respectively, each by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history,

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Filogonio Velasquez Mejia has moved for leave to withdraw and has *266filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Velasquez Mejia has no

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-1339 _____________ ROSA ELIDA CASTRO; A.A.G.C.; LAURA LISSETH FLORES-PICHINTE; E.S.U.F.; KAREN MARGARITA ZELAYA ALBERTO; S.E.A.Z; KELLY GUTIERREZ RUBIO; G.J.S.G.; GLADIS CARRASCO GOMEZ; B.J.R.C.; WENDY AMPARO OSORIO MARTINEZ; D.S.R.O.; CARMEN LEIVA-MENJIVAR; E.A.M.L.; A.M.M.L.; DINA ISAB

63 F.3d 1468 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6319, 95 Daily JournalD.A.R. 10,779UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose LOPEZ-FLORES; Jose Eduardo Hernandez; JosePerez-Garcia; and Jaime Ortiz-Mejia, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-50206, 93-50208, 93-50211 and 93-50216. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. No. 93-50206 was Submitted on

*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No

608 F.2d 741 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Juan Ramon HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesus Antonio GASTELUM, charged as Raymond SepulvedaMendoza, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jorge MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Javier GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 516); (101 Fed. Appx. 466); (101 Fed. Appx. 513); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 511); (101 Fed. Appx. 451); (101 Fed. Appx. 541); (101 Fed. Appx. 520); (101 Fed. Appx. 496); (101 Fed. Appx. 463); (101 Fed. Appx. 489); (101 Fed. Appx. 4

BARKETT, Circuit Judge: This cases arises from the hijacking of an aircraft bound for Havana from Nueva Gerona, Cuba that was diverted to Key West, Florida. Appellants Alvenis Arias-Izquierdo, Eduardo Javier Mejia Morales, Neudis Infantes Hernandez, Yainer Oli-vares — Samon, Alexis Norneilla Morales, and Miakel Guerra Morales were tried on four counts pertaining to the hijacki

175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.