Cases

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Estuardo Hernandez-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

MEMORANDUM ** Martin Hernandez-Cruz appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 62-month *749sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez-Cruz’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for rel

MEMORANDUM ** Martin Hernandez-Cruz appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 62-month *749sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez-Cruz’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for rel

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Mauricio Hernandez-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez-Cruz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordi

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Mauricio Hernandez-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez-Cruz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordi

MEMORANDUM** Adolfo Hernandez-Cruz appeals his 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for transportation of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a) (1) (A) (ii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error the district court’s factual finding that the defendant was not a minimal or minor participant for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Unit

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Arcides Cruz-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Cruz-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Hernandez-La Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hernandez-La Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portio

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Luis Alberto Hernandez-Cruz petitions for review of his final order of removal. In his petition to this Court, Hernandez-Cruz argues that his Pennsylvania conviction for child endangerment does not constitute a crime involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”) because his statute of conviction “may be violated without imp

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgments in Criminal Cases, Jorge Alberto Cruz-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.20

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Felix Cruz-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRAN

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Felix Cruz-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRAN

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Aldo Cruz-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED,

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Cruz-Hernandez appeals the 168-month sentence imposed by the district court following his conviction by guilty plea of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm. Cruz-Hernandez contends that the district court erred by denying his request for a minor participant adjustmen

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Hernandez-De la Cruz (Hernandez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Acc

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.